Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

JCP COTTAGELicense 361880626
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

food service provided by S2 and S3 while S1 was away. S1 denied that the facility is not providing adequate meal portions, and stated that the residents receive three meals a day plus snacks in between meals. S1 denied that there are expired foods in the facility's food supply and that the meals are nutritious with various meats and vegetables provided to the residents. LPA Williams interviewed Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2), who both stated that the facility is providing adequate food service. In regards to meal portions, R1 stated that they can be small at times; however, second portions of food may be requested. LPA Williams observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food supply. LPA Williams also observed that items in the food supply did not appear expired nor unpalatable. In regards to allegation #3, LPA Williams interviewed S1 who stated that there was an incident in the past where resident's clothing items were co-mingled in the laundry; however, S1 stated that there have been steps taken to prevent another incident such as this. S1 denied that the residents property is not being safeguarded. LPA Williams interviewed R1 and R2 who denied that their property is not being safeguarded. In regards to allegation #4, LPA Williams interviewed S1 who stated that there are various activities for the residents, including board games, puzzles, and exercising. LPA Williams interviewed R1, who stated that the facility does provide activities for the residents. LPA Williams interviewed, R2, who stated that they choose not to participate in activities provided by the facility. Based on evidence obtained during today’s visit, LPA Williams has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed and a copy was provided to the Administrator at the completion of the visit.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 6, 2021 inspection of JCP COTTAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of JCP COTTAGE on December 6, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to JCP COTTAGE on December 6, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.