Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

and 2 residents are not oriented and unable to answer LPA questions. LPA Brown interviewed 4 staff. 4 out of 4 staff stated that they treat all residents with respect. The second allegation indicates that staff uses derogatory terms During the investigation, LPA Brown was not able to obtain evidence to corroborate the allegation . Interviews with staff and residents indicated that staffs do not use derogatory terms when they speak to the residents. 10 out of 12 residents reported that all staff speak to them nicely and with respect and no staff uses derogatory terms when they speak to them and 2 residents are not oriented and unable to answer LPA questions. LPA Brown interviewed 4 staff. 4 out of 4 staff stated that they never use derogatory terms when they speak to the residents. The third allegation indicates staff is creating a hostile environment. LPA Brown was not able to obtain evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with staff and residents indicated that staff are not creating a hostile environment to the residents. 10 out of 12 residents indicated that staff at the facility do not create a hostile environment to the residents. They reported that staff are nice to them, and they assist them if they need help or need something. LPA Brown interviewed 4 staff. 4 out of 4 staff stated that they never create hostile environment to the residents. The fourth allegation indicates staff failed to assist residents after sustaining a fall. LPA Brown was not able to obtain evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with staff and residents indicated that all staff helps resident after sustaining a fall. 10 out of 12 residents reported that all staffs help residents after sustaining a fall. LPA Brown interviewed four (4) staff. 4 out 4 staff stated that they always help residents after sustaining a fall. The fifth allegation indicates there is unclear staff working at the facility. LPA Brown was not able to obtain evidence to corroborate the allegation. During the visit, LPA Brown checked all staff working at the facility and observed that all staff working have fingerprint clearance. LPA Brown interviewed four (4) staff and 4 out of 4 staff reported they need to have fingerprint clearance before they can start working at the facility. ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** Based on the information obtained and observation, there is not enough evidence to state Staff does not treat residents with respect (allegation #1), Staff uses derogatory terms (allegation #2), Staff is creating a hostile environment.(allegation #3), Staff failed to assist resident after sustaining a fall (allegation #4), and There is an unclear staff working at the facility (allegation # 5). Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report (LIC 9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Michael Garcia.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type A

    87303 Maintenance and Operation(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility do not have working call button (rroom #116) near the residents bed to alert staff if residents need care which poses an immediate risk to resident in care.

  • 87705(b)(1)Type B

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia(b) In addition to the requirements as specified in Section 87208, Plan of Operation, the plan of ...(1) Procedures for notifying the resident’s ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record review, the Licensee did not comply by not reporting incidents of unwitnessed fall of Resident 1 (R1) at the facility to Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) which poses a potential risk to resident in care.

  • 87705(c)(4)Type A

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: (4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record review, the Licensee do not have adequate number of direct care staff working at the facility to meet residents needs which poses an immediate risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 25, 2022 inspection of JASMIN TERRACE AT YUCCA VALLEY?

This was a complaint inspection of JASMIN TERRACE AT YUCCA VALLEY on April 25, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to JASMIN TERRACE AT YUCCA VALLEY on April 25, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.