Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection

GRACIOUS LIVINGLicense 36188104113 citations on this visit
13 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 04/15/2024 at 01:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with a staff and was granted entry to the facility. Administrator Paul Krause was contacted and arrived during the visit. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff present, and five (five) residents present. The facility is a five (5) bedroom, two (2) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room, garage. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden and approved for two (2) hospice waiver. The current census is five (5) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Staff #2 (S2) to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA Brown inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Brown observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Brown measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 130 degrees Fahrenheit. Deficiencies will be issued. Administrator regulated the hot water to 119 degrees Fahrenheit during the visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguishers were also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. However, LPA Brown observed two (2) residents with half bedrail but per documents review, no written order from physician indicating the need for postural support - bedrail for mobility in the two (2) residents facility file. Deficiency will be issued. Also, LPA Brown observed one (1) resident with full bed rail but not on hospice and per documents review, no approved exception on file. Deficiency will be issued. LPA Brown observed no Emergency Disaster Plan at the facility. Deficiency will be issued. LPA Brown did not observed Fire Drill or Earthquake Drill conducted at the facility. Deficiency will be issued.There is a Medicine Cabinet for the residents with the resident’s medications locked. LPA Brown observed the complete first aid kit and first aid book at the facility. Food Service: More than seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and more than two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: The facility has an Administrator present in the facility with appropriate and enough hours to appropriately manage the facility. The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA Brown reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals. LPA Brown observed one (1) resident Admission Agreement was not signed by the Licensee. Deficiency will be issued. LPA Brown observed no Personnel Records available during the visit. Deficiency will be issued. In addition, Administrator Krause reported to LPA Brown that staff records were maintained at the other facility. Deficiency will be issued. Moreover, LPA Brown observed Staff #3 (S3) working at the facility without criminal background clearance and S3 reported to LPA Brown that S3 has been working at the faciity since 12/2023. Deficiency will be issued. Also, LPA Brown observed Staff #1 (S1) working at the facility with criminal background clearance but criminal background clearance was not transferred to the facility. Deficiency will be issued and Civil Penalties were assessed during the facility visit with the amount of $500.00 and will continue to be assessed of $100.00 per day per citation until corrected for failure to obtain criminal record clearance for S3 and for not transferring S1 criminal background clearance to the facility. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** LPA Brown interviewed Staff #2 (S2) and S2 reported no Dementia training was provided to staffs at the facility. Deficiency will be issued. Medications/electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) were audited, and LPA Brown observed no issue. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC9102 forms, LIC421BG and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Administrator Paul Krause.

Citations

13 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.695(c)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not conducting the required fire drill and earthquake drill at the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(e)(2)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not regulating the hot water in residents' shared bathroom between 105 degrees Fahrenheit to 120 degrees Fahrenheit which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(e)(3)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not identifying tap water that delivers water above 125 degree F by warning signs which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(e)Type A

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not obtaining a ciminal record clearance for Staff #3 before allowing S3 to work at the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(e)(3)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not transferring Staff #1 (S1) criminal record clearance to the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(c)(1)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having staffs receive appropriate training in first aid from persons qualified by such agencies as teh American Red Cross which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(f)Type A

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not making the personnel records available to the licensing agency to inspect, and audit which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(g)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not maintaining all personnel records at the facility which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87507(c)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not signing the Admission Agreement issued to one (1) resident which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87608(a)(5)(A)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and (record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by allowing two (2) residents with half bed rail but no written order from their physician indicating the need for half bed rail for mobility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87705(c)(3)(A)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not providing the required dementia trainings to staffs at the facility which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.695(a)Type A

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having an Emergency Disaster Plan completed and maitained at the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87608(a)(5)(B)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by allowing one (1) resident to have full bed rail who's not on hospice and without approved exception from CCLD which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 15, 2024 inspection of GRACIOUS LIVING?

This was a inspection inspection of GRACIOUS LIVING on April 15, 2024. 13 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious) and 10 Type B.

Were any citations issued to GRACIOUS LIVING on April 15, 2024?

Yes, 13 citations were issued (3 Type A, 10 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not conducti..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a inspection inspection. inspection inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.