Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LOTUS VILLA AND MEMORY CARELicense 365530102
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Second allegation: Staff left resident in filthy clothes. Regarding the allegation listed above LPA conducted interviews with Resident #2, Resident #3, R#4, and Resident #5, who informed LPA that facility provides laundry services as part of their agreement. In addition, R#2-5 informed LPA of not having any issues or concerns regarding laundry services. R#2-5 informed LPA that caregivers change and dress residents twice a day (morning & night), and as needed in case resident might need a diaper change or during an accident. LPA conducted a file review and observed that the facility provides laundry services to residents as part of their basic services listed on their admission agreement. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, S#2, and Staff #3, who informed LPA that facility provides laundry services twice a week for all residents or as needed. Third allegation: Staff did not ensure resident in care was hydrated. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5 regarding the allegation stated above and all residents informed LPA that facility provides and has water available to all residents in care. In addition, resident #2-5, informed LPA that the facility has water dispensers available throughout the facility. In addition, water is also provided to resident[s] upon residents’ request. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1-3, regarding the allegation stated above, and staff #1-5 informed LPA that there is a total of three (3), water stations available to residents and that water is also available upon residents’ request. Furthermore, Staff #1, S#2, and Staff #3, also informed LPA that pitchers of water are provided, to assist residents when taking medication. Fourth allegation: Staff did not ensure resident in care was properly fed. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5 who informed LPA that facility provides residents with breakfast, lunch, dinner, and in between snacks, R#2-5 also informed LPA that the facility provide options from their optional menu incase the resident does not want to eat what is being served. In addition, R#2-5 informed LPA that facility has a dining area where residents eat however, caregivers will usually take residents food into resident’s room incase resident is not in the dining area. LPA conducted interviews with S#1, S#2, and S#3, LPA went over the allegation with staff and S#1-3 informed LPA that all residents are provided three meals a day and food is typically provided in the dining area or delivered to the resident depending on residents needs. Fifth allegation: Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care: Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, S#2, and Staff #3, who informed LPA that on 11/19/2023 Resident #1 was transported to local hospital for further evaluation regarding R#1 being weak and not eating. LPA requested for documentation pertaining to Resident #1 during review of record LPA discovered that after R#1 discharge R#1 was prescribed Cephalexin (Keflex 500 Mg) to take twice a day for five (5), days for UTI. Based on R#1 medication list R#1 completed treatment. In addition, during further record review LPA observed that resident was diagnosed with urinary tract infection, and weakness, no indication of dehydration was listed as a diagnosis for Resident #1. Based on corroborating evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegation is Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel at the end of the visit.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 26, 2025 inspection of LOTUS VILLA AND MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of LOTUS VILLA AND MEMORY CARE on August 26, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LOTUS VILLA AND MEMORY CARE on August 26, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.