complaint·March 14, 2022

***continued from 9099*** The LPA observed the ceiling repairs. Interviews with the director, Staff 1 (S1), R1 was being provided laundry services every Monday. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report was provided to the director. ***Continued from 9099*** An interview with the facility director, Sam DeGuzman and R1 revealed R1 sustained a fall on 11/23/21, which resulted in a laceration to the left arm. R1's wounds were treated by the on-site nurse as well as urgent care. Based on LPAs observations and interviews, which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 ) is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC 9099D, LIC 81 and appeal rights were provided to Erick Romero, Director of Culinary Sevices.