Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

For the allegation, Staff do not have fingerprint clearance.During staff interviews 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have fingerprint clearance. During record review, LPA Rico verify the photo identification matched the clearance letter. For the allegation, Staff lock facility doors to prevent residents from leaving.During staff interviews 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have locked facility doors and have not locked residents inside their bedrooms. In addition, 3 out of the 6 residents stated they have not been locked inside the facility. For the allegation, Staff insert suppositories to residents in care. During staff interviews 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not insert suppositories to residents in care. 3 out of the 4 staff stated that only hospice nurses can provide suppositories to residents, not caregivers. For the allegation, Staff did not complete required training's. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have completed their training's. During record review LPA verify all staff members were provided with training's. For the allegation, Staff facility records are falsified. During staff interviews 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not falsified facility records and have not alternated residents’ documents. During record review, LPA verify staff signatures matched facility documents. For the allegation, Staff did not maintain resident records. 4 out of the staff stated the facility has maintain resident records. During record review, LPA observed residents residents records maintain at the facility. For the allegation, Residents are not provided proper food service. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they provided proper food service for residents in care. In addition, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they provided breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks in between. During resident interviews, 3 out of the 6 residents stated they receive proper food services. During facility tour, LPA observed facility menu and food supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days at the facility. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the eight (8) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to House Manager Megaswati Siby.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 22, 2024 inspection of GOLDEN YEARS RESIDENTIAL CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of GOLDEN YEARS RESIDENTIAL CARE on November 22, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GOLDEN YEARS RESIDENTIAL CARE on November 22, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.