Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection (multi-day)

MESA BOARD AND CARELicense 3708044557 citations on this visit
7 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to complete the Required 1-Year Visit from May 3, 2024. LPA was greeted by, Caregiver, Melvin Mesa. LPA met and discussed the purpose of the visit with the Administrator, Mesa. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. Licensee applied for increased capacity from two (2) non-ambulatory residents to four (4) non-ambulatory residents. Fire Clearance was approved on June 23, 2022, for a total capacity of six (6) of whom four (4) may be non-ambulatory. As of today, there were two (2) residents in care of whom one (1) was non-ambulatory. LPA toured the facility and discussed with the Administrator regarding operation. On May 3, 2024, LPA, accompanied by Administrator, Mesa, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was in good repair. Some areas of the facility, bathrooms, and kitchen were observed with clutter, and the floors and area rugs were dirty. Some areas inside and outside the facility were observed with clutter, however, hallways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. No immediate safety risk was observed. Residents’ bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present, all safely stored. The food sitting on the kitchen counter accessible to residents contained items with expiration dates dating back to 2021 and 2022. (Continue at LIC 809C) (continue from LIC809) The licensee discarded expired food during the visit. The refrigerator was observed with spoiled food in unmarked containers which were also discarded during the visit. It was observed that cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, however, the medication for one resident was not centrally located in the designated storage area. In addition, it was observed that old medication had not been discarded as required. The facility had no pools of water on the premises. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. The facility fire extinguisher was serviced in April 2024. First aid kit(s) were observed to be complete and accessible as required. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The room temperature in the facility was comfortable at 70 degrees. LPA interviewed staff and residents and reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. However, the residents’ Physician’s Reports and the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan were not updated as required by Title 22 regulations. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. During today’s visit, LPA observed via measurement with a thermometer device, that hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients complied with regulations. Water from the kitchen sink reached 110 F. The licensee did not have proof of current/active business liability insurance. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809-D pages). Plans of Correction were jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Cecilia Mesa, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 809D and LIC811 and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.

Citations

8 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87811(a)(1)(A)Type B

    87211(a)(1)(A) Reporting Requirements. (a) Each licensee shall furnish a written report to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of a death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred. This requirement was not met. Based on staff interviews and records review, the licensee did not report the death of a resident (R1). This posed a potential safety risk to 1 of 3 residents in care

  • 1569.605Type B

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not have current liability insurance covering injury for residents in care (R1 and R2). Which which poses a potential safety risk to two (2) of two (2) persons in care.

  • 1569.695(c)Type B

    Based on observations, records review and staff interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not conduct ememrgency drills since 2014. Which poses a potential safety risk for two (2) of two (2) persons in care.

  • 1569.695(e)(3)Type B

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not have a record of the medications for resident R1. Which posed a potential health risk to persons one (1) of two (2) residents in care.

  • Arrange appropriate medical and dental care

    Based on observations the licensee did not obtain medical assessments for residents in care, physician's reports for Residents R1 and R2 were outdated. Which poses a potential health risk to persons in care.

  • Record dose details and resident medication response

    Based on observations, staff interview and records review , the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two (2) out of two (2) residents, R1 and R2. Which posed a potential health risk to two (2) of two (2) persons in care.

  • Label and preserve medicine compliance standards

    Based on observations, staff interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (1) out of two (2) residents in care. Which posed a potential health risk to one (1) of two (2) persons in care.

  • Food quality controls and rejected damaged goods

    Based on observations and staff interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not dispose of expired food from the pantry and refigerator for residents in care, R1 and R2. Which posed a potential health risk to two (2) of two (2) persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 6, 2024 inspection of MESA BOARD AND CARE?

This was an other inspection of MESA BOARD AND CARE on May 6, 2024. 7 citations were issued: 7 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MESA BOARD AND CARE on May 6, 2024?

Yes, 7 citations were issued (0 Type A, 7 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211(a)(1)(A) Reporting Requirements. (a) Each licensee shall furnish a written report to the licensing agency and to t..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.