Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

ST. PAUL'S VILLALicense 370804823
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

R1 records reflected that R1 was non-ambulatory and required assistance with bathing, hair care, personal hygiene, toileting and medication management. A Durable Power Of Attorney (DPOA) served as R1’s financial and healthcare representative and also served as R1’s emergency contact. According to a statement from the DPOA, in 2021, R1 became ill and was placed into a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). When R1 was recovered, they were moved into St. Paul's Villa. When asked, DPOA informed LPA that there was never a problem for R1 to obtain healthcare from their physicians. DPOA said R1 was 99 years old in January 2021 but healthy and lucid at that time. R1 told the DPOA that they did not want to spend time in a hospital anymore and wanted to receive hospice services instead. A hospice service was selected, and St. Paul's Villa arranged for them to provide hospice services to R1 at the facility. The hospice group brought in all of their needed equipment and administered hospice services to R1. DPOA stated that R1’s hospice group was very attentive to R1’s needs. DPOA said neither of R1’s physicians called the DPOA to express concerns with R1’s transition to hospice nor did neither physician claim R1 was not accessible to them. DPOA said R1 was never denied access to medical care nor were they denied the ability to communicate with their physicians. DPOA said R1’s primary care provider remained their doctor until they passed on 12/3/2022. In February 2021, R1 was interviewed as part of this investigation. At the time of the interview, R1 resided at St. Paul's Villa in an Assisted Living room. R1 told LPA that they were receiving hospice care and recently transferred from a SNF for a leg injury. R1 said hospice nurses visited them twice in the previous two weeks. Mainly, the nurses talked with R1. R1 did not know much about their hospice contract and said their DPOA handled those affairs. R1 said they were healthy and only in the last two years experienced a decline in their health. R1 had a lung infection. R1 said their medical records are small due to their good health. When asked, R1 said they have no concerns with accessing care from their primary physician. The Department has investigated the allegation that the facility restricted a resident’s access to their physician. Based upon the information obtained during this investigation; it is determined that although the incident may have happened and is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it occurred and is therefore UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Downing, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee's Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via hard copy.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 18, 2023 inspection of ST. PAUL'S VILLA?

This was a complaint inspection of ST. PAUL'S VILLA on January 18, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ST. PAUL'S VILLA on January 18, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.