complaint·January 26, 2024

Continued from LIC9099 p.1 Resident interview did not corroborate the allegation, as R1 confirmed that the Licensee assisted them in taking steps to protect their belongings. Outside source interview revealed that the incident was investigated by the local police agency who determined that the Licensee took steps to protect R1's personal property; no evidence was found to support the allegation. Records review corroborated staff statements regarding R1's waiver to inventory personal property, which was signed on 10/30/23. Records review further revealed that once they were made aware of the missing money, the Licensee made the required notifications within the required timeframes to all agencies and responsible parties. During an unannounced facility visit LPA directly observed both the facility-installed safe and R1's personal safe in their apartment. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Nina Haaland, LVN Supervisor , to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.