Complaint·December 7, 2023

(Continue from LIC9099) R1 continued to live at the facility under the care and supervision of the outside agency with coordinated care provided by facility staff. Therefore, this allegation is unfounded as the 30-day notice was not put in effect. It was also alleged the licensee did not notify R1’s responsible party of a care conference that was held on April 24, 2023. Per a review of the care conference minutes it was disclosed that the outside medical agency responsible for R1’s medical care coordinated and set up the care conference. The licensee assumed the outside agency notified R1’s responsible party. The investigation did not disclose any evidence that the licensee purposely excluded R1’s responsible party from participating in the care conference. Based on the results of the investigation, which consisted of observations, interviews with staff, and outside sources, and a review of pertinent resident and facility records there was no evidence found to support the allegations listed in this report. The Department has found that the complaint allegations were unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened, and/or are without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report, Confidential Names List (LIC 811), and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. (Continue from LIC9099A) The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegations and based on interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Vida Dacanay, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.