Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

SUNRISE AT LA COSTALicense 3746011341 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Resident Care Director Mikhail Grant. Today's visit was in response to an LIC624 Incident Report, which licensee self-submitted to the CCLD San Diego Regional Office (received on 06/05/2023). According to the LIC624: on 06/03/2023, Resident #1 (R1), who resides in the facility’s secured memory care unit, briefly eloped from the facility (left without staff supervision). [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of person identifiers used in this report.] R1 was quickly recovered by staff, unharmed/uninjured. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility and performed a welfare check on R1, verifying that they were indeed unharmed/uninjured. LPA also reviewed pertinent care and business records and interviewed relevant staff. Due to their baseline memory loss and disorientation, R1 was not able to participate as a reliable interviewee/historian. Per their LIC602’s Physician’s Report (dated 10/17/2022), R1's primary diagnosis was “Alzheimer’s Disease,” and their doctor determined that they were unable to safely leave the facility unassisted. According to care records and corroborated by staff interviews: On the morning of 06/03/2023, R1 activated a 15-second delayed egress door within the facility’s memory care neighborhood, which allowed them to exit the building and walk to a nearby sidewalk. Staff #1 (S1) immediately heard the activated door alarm, but was slightly delayed responding to the door, because they were assisting another resident on the toilet. Staff #2 (S2) was already outside (taking their break), and soon saw R1 and escorted them back inside. R1 was only briefly unattended, and they were recovered without harm/injury. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] During today’s visit, LPA, accompanied by facility management, activated/tested each of the delayed-egress doors and courtyard gate associated with the facility’s “Reminiscence” secured memory care unit. All doors correctly locked and unlocked, and alarmed and reset, consistent with regulation. LPA observed: a) There were three delayed egress doors which led from the Reminiscence interior to and from the Reminiscence courtyard. These three doors were entirely missing the required signs which are described in California Health and Safety Code; b) The “Stair C” and “Stair D” doors were delayed egress going in both directions (in and out). However, these two doors had signs on only one side of the door; and, c) For those delayed egress doors and courtyard gate that did have the required signs, in all instances the signs themselves were not positioned within 12 inches of either the panic bar or the door latching hardware, as required. One (1) deficiency was cited per California Health and Safety Code (refer to the attached LIC 809-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. LPA also provided Technical Assistance regarding staffing and licensee’s absentee notification plan/policy. An exit interview was conducted with Grant, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, the LIC9102-TA pages, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.699Type B

    1569.699 Exit doors; egress-control devices of time-delay type; fences: "(a)(7)(A) A sign shall be provided on the door located above and within 12 inches of the panic bar or other door-latching hardware reading: 'KEEP PUSHING. THIS DOOR WILL OPEN IN __ SECONDS. ALARM WILL SOUND.'" This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on observation, licensee did not provide signs meeting regulatory requirements on its delayed-egress doors, within an area of the facility where 20 of 62 residents (Resident #1 through Resident #20) resided, which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 7, 2023 inspection of SUNRISE AT LA COSTA?

This was a other inspection of SUNRISE AT LA COSTA on June 7, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SUNRISE AT LA COSTA on June 7, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.699 Exit doors; egress-control devices of time-delay type; fences: "(a)(7)(A) A sign shall be provided on the door ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.