Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VMB ULTIMATE CARELicense 3746019362 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continue from LIC9099) Interviews and facility records revealed that on the afternoon of 07/23/21 R1 and a direct caregiver Staff #1 (S1) were outside smoking cigarettes on the facility front porch. S1 acknowledged during interview statements that they had been advised of R1’s prior elopements and knew R1 was not be left unsupervised. S1 admitted they left the resident alone for 10-15 minutes and went inside to use the bathroom. R1 was alone in an unsecured area of the facility that led directly out to the street. When S1 returned to the porch fifteen minutes later, at approximately 1:00 pm, R1 had left the facility unattended and was not in sight. S1 stated they advised the licensee, Staff #2 (S2) who was present at the facility and searched the immediate vicinity on foot but could not find the resident. When S1’s care shift ended at 6:00 pm in the evening, R1 had still not returned. After the elopement occurred, S2 drove around local streets looking for R1 but acknowledged that they did not call 911 to report the elderly resident as missing. During interview statements, S2 claimed that they attempted to call a non-emergency police number and later went to the local police station that evening but the station was closed. S2 did not leave a voice message or other form of communication to advise law enforcement of the elopement. The next day, 7/24/21, at approximately 8:00 am, the licensee notified R1’s responsible party and other family members of the elopement. A family member then immediately reported R1 as at-risk missing person to local police and advised them R1 had been missing for nearly 24 hours. At approximately 5:45 pm on the evening of 7/24/21, community members found R1 lying injured in a drainage ditch. The open ditch was located down a 20-foot sloped embankment in an empty construction lot several blocks away from the facility. A review of medical and outside source records confirmed that R1 was assessed with serious injuries including a badly fractured ankle, severe dehydration, and a black eye. R1 also had multiple bruises, abrasions and skin tears on their upper and lower extremities from falling into the ditch and a stage 2 pressure injury on their hip. The acute pressure injury was diagnosed as caused by R1 lying immobile for a prolonged period in one position. Medical records noted the resident was “covered in ants and dried feces” and was observed as confused, disoriented and expressing acute pain due to their injuries. R1 required immediate surgery for the ankle fracture and was hospitalized for five days, then discharged to a post-acute care skilled nursing facility. (continue at LIC9099C) (Continue from LIC9099) During investigative interview statements, both S1 and S2 admitted that they knew this resident had a history of previous elopements: R1 had previously gone missing twice from their facility, most recently on 9/7/20 and was brought back by police each time, after neighbors observed the resident wandering away and called local law enforcement. Outside source records revealed that during a subsequent interview, the licensee stated they “did not think it was necessary to call 911” and decided to “wait and see” if the resident would return on their own. Licensee and staff statements also confirmed that they knew the resident had a medical diagnosis of severe cognitive impairment and required close supervision to prevent elopement risk. Based on multiple staff and outside source interviews and review of documentation including medical records, the allegations are substantiated. This Department has investigated the allegations noted above. The Department has found that based upon records review and interviews gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Therefore, these allegations are deemed substantiated. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 is being assessed today and per Health and Safety Code Section 1569.49, an additional civil penalty assessment is under review by the Program Administrator of the Community Care Licensing Division.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(D)Type B

    87211(a)(D) Reporting Requirements - Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Interviews and records review showing licensee did not report the elopement of R1 to local licensing as required. This posed an potential safety risk to one of six residents in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    87464(f)(1) - Elopement resulting in serious bodily injury. Basic Sercices shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides ...., ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Interviews and record reviews showing staff left R1 unassisted on 7/23/21, resulting in elopement with serious bodily injury and hospitalization. This posed an immediate safety risk to one of six residents in care. Immediate CP of $500 assessed today

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 20, 2023 inspection of VMB ULTIMATE CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of VMB ULTIMATE CARE on January 20, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VMB ULTIMATE CARE on January 20, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211(a)(D) Reporting Requirements - Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.