Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

VMB ULTIMATE CARELicense 3746019363 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced case management visit to cite deficiencies. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. Review of the Department’s Active Administrator List dated 9/16/2025 revealed that Virgil P. Bucatcat, who is the currently listed Administrator for the facility, did not have an active or pending renewal for an Administrator Certificate, and their latest Administrator Certificate expired in 2013. Additionally, Staff 1, [House Manager was provided with an LIC811 Confidential Names List to identify individuals] who was acting as a facility manager did not have active or pending renewal for Administrator Certificate. Review of an Administrator Certificate for Staff 2 revealed that S2 had an active Administrator Certificate for residential care facilities for the elderly, however, interviews confirmed that facility management had not submitted a Change of Administrator request to the Department. Additionally, Staff 1 stated during multiple conversations that only Residents 1 and 2 were receiving hospice services and Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were not receiving hospice services. Staff 1 only provided LPA Borunda with hospice records for R1 and R2. However, interviews with outside sources and review of facility records revealed that Residents 1-7 were under the care of a hospice provider and were receiving hospice services. Residents 1-6 were all admitted to the facility at the same time, which placed the facility over their approved and pending hospice waiver requests. In 2013, the facility was originally approved to admit 2 hospice residents, however in 2022, the facility applied for a hospice waiver increase from 2 to 4 residents. Continued on LIC809-C page... Following a visit from the Department on 7/23/2025, S1 submitted a hospice waiver increase to 6 residents, which is still pending with the Department. Therefore the following deficiencies for lack of active Administrator, false claims, and over capacity for hospice residents are being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the LIC811, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87207Type B

    87207 No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S1 stated that only 2 of 6 residents were receiving hospice services, when it was actually 6 of 6 residents. This poses a potential person rights risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.

  • 87407(k)(1)Type B

    87407 (k) Whenever a certified administrator assumes… responsibility for administering a residential care facility for the elderly, he or she shall provide written notice, within thirty (30) days, to: (1) The local licensing office… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that a written notice of S2 acting at the facility’s administrator was not submitted to the Department. This poses a potential safety risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.

  • 87632(a)Type B

    87632 (a) In order accept or retain terminally ill residents… the licensee shall have obtained a facility hospice care waiver from the Department… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility was caring for 6 hospice residents without requesting an hospice waiver for 6 residents. This posed a potential health risk to 6 of 6 residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 18, 2025 inspection of VMB ULTIMATE CARE?

This was a other inspection of VMB ULTIMATE CARE on September 18, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VMB ULTIMATE CARE on September 18, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (0 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "87207 No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regardi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.