Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LA COSTA GOLF RCFELicense 3746019991 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interview with Licensee revealed the facility had three to four covid positive residents in the month of December 2021. The licensee recalls "big confusion" during that time period in regards to Covid-19. The licensee further stated that facility staff did not allow visitors inside the facility for approximately one week in December 2021. Based upon staff interviews, the above allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Marko Kolomijcev and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to Marko Kolomijcev whose signature below confirms receipt of documents. Interview with Licensee revealed the staff member that worked directly with the covid positive residents during the month of December 2021, was also covid positive. The licensee further stated that their was always two caregivers on duty and proper PPE protocol was always followed during the covid outbreak. It was alleged that the facility telephone was in disrepair. On December 21, 2021 LPA Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to the facility and verified that the facility phone had a dial tone and was working appropriately. LPA Serrano also called the facility at a later time and the phone call was answered by facility staff. Based on LPA interviews and LPA observation, we have found that the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Marko Kolomijcev and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to Marko Kolomijcev whose signature below confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(11)Type B

    To have their visitors, including ombudspersons and advocacy representatives, permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours and without prior notice, provided that the rights of other residents are not infringed upon.This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview the licensee did not allow residents to have their visitors...permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours and without prior notice, 5 in 5 of [5] persons in care. which posed a potential Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 19, 2022 inspection of LA COSTA GOLF RCFE?

This was a complaint inspection of LA COSTA GOLF RCFE on December 19, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LA COSTA GOLF RCFE on December 19, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "To have their visitors, including ombudspersons and advocacy representatives, permitted to visit privately during reason..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.