Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

VILLA LORENALicense 374603750
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

If staff call out for less than three (3) hours, then the staff already working will stay over for approximately one (1) to two (2) hours as needed. ED expressed staff have not complained and they all work together as family. The ED explained there were a couple of unforeseen circumstances that came about with staff not being present due to family emergencies. However, all shifts were covered. Resident interviews expressed their needs are met and when they call for assistance, it’s received. The Resident Service Director (RSD) also confirmed the facility has sufficient staffing. The RSD explained the memory care unit has one (1) lead; four (4) caregivers; one (1) med tech; one (1) activity director. The Memory Care Director (MCD) also confirmed the memory care unit has sufficient staffing. Outside source interviews revealed the facility had insufficient staffing and addressed the issue with the MCD. On 10/29/22 the MDC responded to the outside source in writing and explained during this time a Medication Technician had a medical emergency and another care staff had a death in their family. However, services were not interrupted for the residents. The facility always ensured sufficient staff were present to meet the residents’ needs. It was also alleged the facility was malodorous in the memory care unit. On 11/08/22, LPA observed the memory care unit, it was clean and odor free. Later in the visit, LPA was out in the common area and observed a strong feces odor. There was a resident sitting in a chair in the common area that fell asleep, sitting up in the chair. The resident had a bowel movement in their incontinent briefs. Staff interviews confirmed that residents were unable to alert staff when they have a bowel movement due to their Major Neurocognitive Disorder. Staff interviews revealed they check the residents every two (2) hours but if they smell the resident, they change their briefs immediately. The MCD also confirmed a specific resident likes to fall asleep in the common area and they have bowel movements, while in the common area. The MCD also stated staff check residents every two (2) hours or sooner if a smell was observed. The ED, RSD, and MCD all confirmed there were no odors in the memory care unit. The Maintenance Director’s interview confirmed there were no odors, and the carpets were shampooed every two (2) weeks. The housekeeper’s interview also confirmed there were no odors but sometimes a resident has a bowel movement on themselves and that can cause the common area to smell. However, once observed, the caregivers change the residents. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegation. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided to Memory Care Director, Marie Lou Fikingas whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Safe, healthful, comfortable accommodations

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents...facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews the licensee did not ensure resident’s safety equipment was operable for 1 out of 71 residents [R1] due to the wander guard being inoperable for approximately threedays, which posed a potential safety and/or personal rights to residents in care.

  • Dignity in personal relationships

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in...facilities...shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews the licensee did not accord dignity to 1 out of 71 residents [R1] when they covered R1’s laptop camera, which posed a potential safety and/or personal rights to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 26, 2024 inspection of VILLA LORENA?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLA LORENA on March 26, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VILLA LORENA on March 26, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.