Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

NOBLE LIVING II LLCLicense 3746039132 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

[Continued from LIC9099, Page 2 of 2] On December 2, 2022, Administrator stated that two blank copies of the Admissions Agreement were given to Resident 1’s (R1 - See LIC811 Confidential Names List) Power of Attorney (POA) for POA to review the agreement at home. The next day, POA returned a signed copy of the Admissions Agreement to the facility. Administrator admitted she did not provide a signed copy because she had given a blank copy to POA previously. In the Admissions Agreement was an addendum signed by POA and Administrator stating that a refund would not be due if a resident on hospice died within the first thirty (30) days of moving into the facility. Facility records showed R1’s care for December 2022 was paid for on December 2, 2022. The signed Admissions Agreement stated that an preadmission fee was not being charged. On December 6, 2022, R1 passed away while on hospice. Outside sources, Licensee, and Administrator confirmed R1’s personal belongings were taken out of R1’s room on the same day, December 6, 2022, leaving only a medical bed and oxygen machine in the room. Outside sources indicated the bed and oxygen machine were considered durable medical equipment (DME) and belonged to an agency contracted by R1’s hospice agency. Outside sources confirmed that the DME was rented to hospice and not the resident. Outside source, Licensee, and Administrator confirmed the bed and oxygen machine were taken out on December 12, 2022. Licensee maintained the DME was considered personal belongings. Licensee chose to refund POA after resident’s death, despite the addendum signed by POA. The date the DME was removed from the facility factored into the refund amount and the date refund was issued. Facility’s refund invoice showed that an admissions fee and a rush fee were charged. Licensee maintained that the fees were verbally agreed to by POA and no written documentation of the fees were created. Outside source records revealed a refund check was issued to R1’s authorized representative on December 21, 2022. Based on the evidence obtained during the complaint investigation, the allegations that the facility did not refund money owed after resident's death and that the Licensee did not provide a signed copy of the Admissions Agreement to authorized representative is found to be SUBSTANTIATED, as there is a preponderance of evidence to show the violation occurred. Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC9099D and a plan of correction was jointly developed with Administrator. An exit interview was conducted; a copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.652(c)Type B

    Refund of fees paid: (c) A refund of any fees paid in advance ... covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed... shall be issued ... within 15 days after the personal property is removed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the licensee did issue a refund after a resident’s death in 2 of 7 residents, which posed a personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87507(e)Type B

    Admission Agreements: (e) The licensee shall provide a copy of the signed and dated current admission agreement…to...the resident's representative…immediately upon signing the admission agreement… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the licensee did not provide a signed Admissions Agreement which posed a personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87507(h)(4)Type B

    Admission Agreements: (h)The admission agreement shall not contain...: (4) Any provision that violates the rights of any residents...specified...in Health and Safety Code section 1569 et seq. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee included unlawful provisions in the Admissions Agreement which posed a personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 20, 2023 inspection of NOBLE LIVING II LLC?

This was a complaint inspection of NOBLE LIVING II LLC on January 20, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to NOBLE LIVING II LLC on January 20, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Refund of fees paid: (c) A refund of any fees paid in advance ... covering the time after the resident’s personal proper..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.