Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

[CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099] During a 11-16-2021 visit to commence the complaint investigation, LPA sought to interview R1, but respectfully waited for them to first complete a phone call they were on before approaching them. For around 15 minutes, LPA observed R1 sitting in a shaded area of the facility’s courtyard in relative privacy, holding the facility’s cordless phone to their ear and speaking on it. After the call, LPA helped R1 hail down a staff member to hand the phone back to them. Based on LPA’s interview of R1 about many topics (lasting over an hour), R1 appeared fully alert and oriented with no apparent memory loss. According to R1, they never owned a cell phone while living at the facility (“because it is too complicated [to use]”). R1 said they regularly use the facility telephone to receive incoming calls, and that their spouse/POA calls them on it in the afternoon, either every day or every other day. R1 said that they rarely choose to make outgoing calls, for fear that the phone line could be tapped/recorded by staff. [According to R1’s medical records, their physician said they have a history of “paranoid behavior.”] R1 said facility staff have never denied them use of the facility phone for either incoming or outgoing calls. R1’s statements about their access to and use of the facility telephone were unanimously corroborated by their spouse/POA, facility staff, and outside sources. According to the licensee, they pay for a second phone landline for the exclusive use of the residents, so that they can speak at length with their loved ones without worrying that they are tying up the business’ phone line. Based on records and interviews, the allegation that licensee did not enable R1’s access to the telephone is unfounded, meaning it was false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the allegation. An exit interview was conducted with the Guerrero, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.2(a)(8)Type A

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities: “(a)…residents in privately operated residential care facilities shall have all of the following rights: …(8) To be free from…financial exploitation…” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records, licensee did not ensure that resident (R1) was free from the financial exploitation of their staff (S1), while R1 was under licensee’s supervision. This posed an immediate personal rights risk to 1 of 28 residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 21, 2022 inspection of MESAVIEW SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MESAVIEW SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING on July 21, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MESAVIEW SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING on July 21, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.