Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

RENAISSANCE LIVING IILicense 3746041052 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alexandre Vo, conducted a case management deficiency found during a complaint investigation. LPA met with Licensee, Richard Edwards, and explained the purpose the case management. The Department’s findings were derived from records and interviews surrounding charges against a former resident’s account that were not agreed upon. During the complaint investigation, financial ledgers show that Resident #1 and Resident #2 were charged a household moving fee of $1,800, as well as, a $475 outside auditor fee. Based on interviews and review documents, neither charges were agreed upon by the residents. Therefore, the Department concludes that the licensee did not adhere to the payment provisions in the residents’ admission agreements. Therefore, the resident, or their representative, is owed $2275.00. In addition, the conflicting language of the facility’s admission agreement indicates that “pre-admission fees are not charged. If in the future a preadmission fee is charged, the admission agreement will be revised…” Records review indicate that residents, R1 through R6, were charged the pre-admission fee of $500.00 each and their admission agreements were not revised to reflect the appropriate charge and refund conditions. Based on evidence gathered during the complaint investigation, the accounting for unsettled funds resulted in an owed amount of $7,711.05. The total refund due to residents R1 and R2, or their representative, is $10,986.05 -- preadmission and unsettled funds. The amount owed to each resident R3, R4, R5, and R6 is $500.00 each. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and are listed on the LIC809D. A Plan of Correction was developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, List of Confidential Names, and Licensee’s Rights (9058 01/16) were provided to the Licensee, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(21)Type B

    1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (21) To have prompt access to review all of their records and to purchase photocopies. Photocopied records shall be promptly provided, not to exceed two business days... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, the Licensee did not provide prompt access to resident records. This posed a potential personal rights risk to one of the five residents in care.

  • 87507(a)(1)(B)Type B

    87507 Admission Agreements (a) … (1) The text of the admission agreement, including any attachments and modifications, shall be: (B) Written in clear, understandable, coherent, and unambiguous language, using words with common and everyday meanings, and shall be appropriately divided with each section appropriately titled. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the admission agreements for six out of seven residents contain ambiguous language regarding pre-admission fees. This posed a potential financial risk to all residents in care.

  • 87507(g)(3)(B)(2)Type B

    87507 Admission Agreements (g) Admission agreements shall specify the following (3)...(B) Rate for additional items and services, including: 2. A separate charge for an item or service may be assessed only if that charge is included in and authorized by the admission agreement. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, the licensee charged resident #1 for a service that was not included and authorized by the admission agreement. This posed a potential financial risk to the resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 20, 2021 inspection of RENAISSANCE LIVING II?

This was a other inspection of RENAISSANCE LIVING II on August 20, 2021. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to RENAISSANCE LIVING II on August 20, 2021?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.