Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

PREMIUM CARE SERVICESLicense 374604138
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Also, administrator stated if a resident is a fall risk, they do not request bed rails for that reason, as that’s not the intended purpose of the bed rail. The administrator went on to explain that hospice provided the hospital bed with a standard mattress, not undersized, and made out of foam, which is not spring loaded like a regular mattress. It was also alleged staff did not provide adequate food service for residents. It was reported that R1 was not receiving enough food. The administrator explained R1 was on hospice, declining and loss of appetite. R1 was always provided food, however, towards the end of life it was difficult for R1 to eat/swallow. The administrator said they were instructed by hospice to feed R1 but be careful due to choking hazard. Administrator added that R1’s family member was upset, as they wanted R1 to eat more food and eat the items brought by the family. However, the administrator followed hospice instructions for R1’s safety. Today, LPA observed a sufficient supply of food in the fridge, freezer, and pantry. Resident interviews confirmed they are receiving enough food and enjoy the food served. Staff stated they cook daily and provide meal options to the residents. It was also alleged staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents. It was reported that on a day when the weather was 90 degrees F., staff only provided non-air-conditioning fans instead of adjusting the room temperature. The facility does not have centralized air conditioning, therefore, the room temperature cannot be adjusted. Today, LPA observed each resident’s room contained a fan, some had a portable window air conditioning units, and there were additional fans in the common areas. Today’s temperature reached 85 degrees F. Some residents were observed wearing sweaters and some using blankets. Resident interviews confirmed the facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature. Also, residents requested the fans not be turned on, as they pointed out they were wearing sweaters. When asked if they felt cold, they explained they were comfortable with their sweaters but did not require the heat to be turned on. The administrator explained they have a sufficient supply of fans. However, when they ask the residents if they would like the fans turned on it’s declined. Continued on LIC 9099C. Lastly, it was alleged staff did not keep the facility free of cockroaches. It was reported an outside source observed a cockroach inside a rice cooker containing uneaten rice. Staff explained they have not observed any cockroaches in food. Staff added the pest control was recently at the facility to spray. The administrator explained they have an annual contract with a professional pest control company. Pest control comes to the facility once a month to spray or more if requested. Resident interviews revealed they have not observed any cockroaches. Staff explained that the pest control company was at the facility two days ago to spray, and staff spray a safe chemical as well for precautionary measures. The facility has measures in place to address cockroaches by having the pest control company on contract. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegations. The allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Administrator, Sheikh Hafiz whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 10, 2025 inspection of PREMIUM CARE SERVICES?

This was a complaint inspection of PREMIUM CARE SERVICES on December 10, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PREMIUM CARE SERVICES on December 10, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.