Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LO-HAR SENIOR LIVINGLicense 374604171
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

According to interview with R2, R1 hit R2 while sitting in the common area. Interview with R2 corroborated that R2 hit R1 after R1 called R2 derogatory names. Interview with staff present revealed R1 and R2 have not had previous instance of disagreements or violent behaviors with each other. Interview with staff present on the date of the incident revealed that staff were feet away from residents when the incident occurred. Interview with outside source revealed that this was an isolated incident. Based on LPA's interviews, and record reviews there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Business Office Manager Amanda Pepin and Clinical Director Yolanda Torres, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.312Type B

    1569.312 Basic Service Requirement Every facility required to be licensed under this chapter shall provide at least the following basic services: (d) Being aware of the resident's general whereabouts, although the resident may travel independently in the community. This requirement was not met as in evidence in: Based on interviews and records reviewed the licensee did not know the whereabouts of R1 which posed a potential Safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87211(c)Type B

    (c) Any suspected physical abuse that does not result in serious bodily injury of an elder or dependent adult shall be reported to the local ombudsman, the corresponding licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours as required by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15630(b)(1). This requirement was not met as in evidence in: Based on interviews and records reviewed the licensee did not report abuse to R1 which posed a Safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 3, 2024 inspection of LO-HAR SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of LO-HAR SENIOR LIVING on October 3, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LO-HAR SENIOR LIVING on October 3, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.