Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

REMINGTON CLUB IILicense 374604232
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continuation of LIC9099) LPA reviewed the staff Daily Assignment schedule for January 13, 2025, through January 18, 2025, and did not observe the names of S1 or S2 on their assignment sheet. Upon further review of the roster for all Remington Club residents, it was determined that R1 did not reside in the licensed Assisted Living facility. LPA interviewed Director of Health and Wellness and confirmed that R1 did not ever reside in the assisted living facility. It was also confirmed that S1 and S2 are not employees of the facility. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during records reviewed and interview with staff, we have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. The allegation was not pertinent to this licensed facility. The Department has cross-reported this complaint to the appropriate agencies for follow-up. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Raquel Matthews, Director of Health and Wellness. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Director of Health and Wellness Matthews at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87412(g)(1)Type B

    Personnel Records 87412 (g)(1) The licensee shall be permitted to retain such records in a central administrative location provided that they are readily available to the licensing agency at the facility as specified in Section 87412(f). This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records review the facility did not comply with the section cited above in one out of the five staff records were not readily available with complete documents, which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Track resident cash safeguard records

    Resident Records 87506 (b)(16) Records of resident's cash resources as specified in Section 87217, Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records review the facility did not comply with the section cited above in four out of the ten residents did not have a Personal Property/Valuables form on file, which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 5, 2025 inspection of REMINGTON CLUB II?

This was a complaint inspection of REMINGTON CLUB II on February 5, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to REMINGTON CLUB II on February 5, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.