Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

LAS VILLAS DEL NORTELicense 374604294
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(CONTINUED FROM LIC9099) alleged that the memory care unit has run out of food, soap, shampoo, and blankets several times. Interviews conducted with six(6) memory care residents revealed three(3) of six(6) memory care residents reported they have never been denied the use of food, soap, shampoo, or blankets at the facility due to lack of supply. Three(3) of six(6) memory care residents were unable to be qualified to be reliable witnesses. Interviews conducted with five(5) memory care staff revealed the memory care unit has not run out of supplies such as soap, shampoo, food, or blankets. During a tour of the memory care unit, LPA observed numerous staff interacting with residents, a stock of supplies of blankets, towels, washcloths, snacks, drinks, soap, shampoo, toothpaste, toothbrushes and personal grooming items. Regarding the allegation "Facility did not provide adequate food service", it was alleged that the memory care residents are usually served food that is expired. Interviews conducted with six(6) memory care residents revealed three(3) of six(6) memory care residents have never observed the food their were provided to be expired or spoiled. Three(3) of six(6) memory care residents were unable to be qualified to be reliable witnesses. Interviews conducted with five(5) memory care staff revealed the memory care unit has not served residents expired food however one(1) staff interviewed reported milk had twice arrived from the main kitchen spoiled during the summer and residents were not served the milk. During a tour of the memory care unit, LPA did not observe any expired or spoiled food or drinks. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468(a)Type B

    Personal Rights- (a) Residents in residential care facilities for the elderly shall have personal rights...those listed in Sections 87468.1, Personal Rights... and 87468.2, Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities, as applicable to the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The Licensee did not ensure resident's call light alarms were answered in a timely manner. Based on records reviewed, R1'sl light alarms were not answered in a timely manner. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 6, 2023 inspection of LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE?

This was a complaint inspection of LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE on January 6, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE on January 6, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.