Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

LAS VILLAS DEL NORTELicense 3746042941 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Eight (8) of nine (9) interviews conducted reported not having knowledge of residents getting sick after eating food that is left out. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Farish. Administrator, Jolene Farish was interviewed and reported the facility had five (5) housekeepers and recently faced a housekeeping shortage due to one (1) housekeeper retiring, one (1) going on leave unexpectedly, and one (1) going on vacation for two (2) weeks. LPA reviewed the July 2024 staff schedule for the housekeepers, which indicates two (2) housekeepers were assigned to MCU on 7/31/2024. On 7/31/2024, RCD Ramirez reported Staff 1 (S1) was assigned as the housekeeper for MCU that day. On 7/31/2024, LPA Romero was in the MCU from approximately 10:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m and did not observe S1 or any other housekeeping staff cleaning the MCU. During LPA’s visit on 7/31/2024, RD Condie had S1 go to the MCU to begin cleaning the six (6) resident bedrooms/bathrooms toured identified to require cleaning. RD Condie reported the MCU would be thoroughly cleaned. Administrator Farish reported the facility has hired a new housekeeper and is in the process of filling the remaining vacancies. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Farish.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87470(a)(2)(A)Type B

    (a) (2) (A) Surfaces such as floors, chairs, toilets, sinks, counters and tabletops shall be cleaned and disinfected on a regular basis to ensure they are safe and sanitary... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA observed 6 of 9 resident bedrooms/bathrooms toured appeared to have feces stuck inside the toilet bowls, on the toilet seats, on the bathroom floor, and/or on the outside bedroom door handles. This poses a potential health/safety/personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 20, 2024 inspection of LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE?

This was a complaint inspection of LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE on August 20, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE on August 20, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a) (2) (A) Surfaces such as floors, chairs, toilets, sinks, counters and tabletops shall be cleaned and disinfected on ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.