complaint·August 25, 2021

It was also alleged that the back yard area of the facility is full of piles of debris that presents a fire hazard. During today's visit, LPA toured the back yard of the facility and observed that there are tree trunks that had been cut and organized along the rear of the property in preparation for pickup. LPA also observed that the yard had mulch that appeared to have been recently placed across the backyard; however, LPA did not observe debris that had been piled or that presents a safety hazard. While the above listed allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and Tess Derafera, Administrator, was provided a copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights, via electronic mail, after conclusion of the visit. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent to LPA upon receipt of the documents. were left. The second allegation is that licensee did not follow universal precautions. It was reported that individuals visited and toured the facility inside and out, but no COVID-19 screening protocols were followed during the visit. During today's visit, upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff at the entrance of the facility. LPA entered the facility and observed a table at the entryway that housed screening forms, a thermometer, sanitizing wipes, and hand sanitizer. LPA also observed a number of staff in the immediate living area; however, LPA was allowed to enter the facility and proceed beyond the screening area without being screened. Once LPA inquired whether she would be screened, staff then directed LPA to the screening questionnaire and took and recorded LPA's temperature. Based upon LPA’s observations during today's visit, the above allegations are substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegations are valid. Deficiencies are cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Tess Derafera, Administrator, and the administrator was provided a copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights, via electronic mail, after conclusion of the visit. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent to LPA upon receipt of the documents. Note: LPA was away from the facility property from 1:15 - 3:15 PM