Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

An interview with S2 corroborated S1 did not allow R1 and R2 to attend their appointment out of fear of contracting COVID-19. In contrast, additional interviews with R1 and facility Staff3 (S3) revealed R1 and R2 chose to not attend the appointment due to their recent recovering from COVID-19. An Outside Source (OS2) interview also corroborated R1 and R2 chose to decline to attend the appointment and needed more time to rest from their recent recovery. It was also alleged residents were not treated with dignity by staff. An interview with OS1 revealed R1 and R2 were not made aware of their medical appointment, and would have wanted to attend. In interviews conducted with R1, S3, and OS2 confirmed R1 and R2 were aware, however declined to attend. Based on interviews and records reviews conducted during the investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding means although the allegations may have occurred but the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Nvard Bedekyan and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) will be provided. Signature of this form confirms receipt the documents were received.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.652Type B

    Termination--- upon death of resident; removal of resident’s property; refund of fees paid; notice of contract termination and refunds. A refund of any fees...covering the time after the resident’s... property has been removed ...shall be issued...within 15 days...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviews the Licensee did not issue a refund upon the death of R1. This poses a potential personal right violation to 1 out of 6 residents in care.

  • Safe, healthful, comfortable accommodations

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in...care facilities for the elderly shall have... the following personal rights. To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable ...furnishings and equipment.This This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on LPA observations on 01/25/2023, the Licensee did not ensure facility staff were in compliance with the proper use of masks while working with residents in care. This posed a potential health risk to 6 out of 6 residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 16, 2023 inspection of COLLEGE TOWN SENIOR RETIREMENT VILLA INC?

This was a complaint inspection of COLLEGE TOWN SENIOR RETIREMENT VILLA INC on February 16, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COLLEGE TOWN SENIOR RETIREMENT VILLA INC on February 16, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.