Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 3746045441 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA asked R1 if the facility staff remind them to put it back on. R1 exclaimed "oh yeah, they remind me all the time." R1 stated that they did not have their oxygen tank when they moved to their temporary room. R1 stated that they could not remember how many days they did not have their oxygen. R1 further stated that the staff probably forgot about it, since R1 never mentioned it to them. LPA interviewed outside agency (OA) who stated that R1 arrived at the emergency room with a low oxygen saturation. OA stated that R1 is required to be on oxygen 24/7.OA stated that the facility was treating R1's room for bed bugs and as a result, R1 was transferred to a different room. OA further stated that staff member 1 (S1) advised OA that R1 was moved to their temporary room without their oxygen tank. S1 further stated that since the room was being treated, staff could not enter the room to retrieve it. OA believes R1 was without their oxygen tank for several days. LPA interviewed R1's responsible party (RP) who stated that R1 has lived at the facility approximately four years. RP stated that R1 is a "pain" and stubborn. RP stated that R1 regularly goes against doctor's orders and refuses to wear compression socks and removes their oxygen regularly. RP stated that R1 will throw staff out of R1's room although they are just trying to help. LPA interviewed S1 who stated that they "do not know what happened" in regards to R1's oxygen tank. S1 stated that R1's oxygen tank was not with R1 prior to being transported to the hospital. S1 explained that R1's room was being treated for bed bugs and facility staff forgot to move R1's oxygen tank to their temporary room. S1 believes that R1 did not have their oxygen on at the time of the move which caused staff to leave the tank in the room. S1 stated that since the room was being treated for bed bugs staff could not enter the room to retrieve the oxygen tank. S1 estimated that R1 was without their oxygen tank for approximately two days. LPA interviewed staff member 2 (S2) who stated that they assisted in clearing out R1's temporary room. S2 stated that they noticed that R1's oxygen tank was not transferred to the room. S2 stated that R1 was without their oxygen for approximately two days. S2 stated that they believe staff simply "forgot to move it out." LPA interviewed Executive Director (ED) who stated that she was not aware of the incident involving R1 and their oxygen tank until today. ED stated that she was out of the office during that time frame and was not advised by staff of the incident. ED further stated that facility staff should be aware of R1's need for oxygen since R1 has an "oxygen sign" posted outside of their door. Based upon the foregoing, the above listed allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and is noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Rebecca Toves and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058, 3/22) were provided to Rebecca Toves whose signature below confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87611(e)Type B

    In addition to Sections 87465(a) and 87464(d), the licensee shall ensure that the resident is cared for in accordance with the physicians orders and that the resident's medical needs are met. Based upon staff and outside agency interviews. The facility did not ensure that one out of 128 residents in care (R1) have their medical equipment transferred to their room. This posed a potential health risk to 1 of 1 of 128 persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 28, 2025 inspection of BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on January 28, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on January 28, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "In addition to Sections 87465(a) and 87464(d), the licensee shall ensure that the resident is cared for in accordance wi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.