Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 374604544
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA interviewed the facility’s Executive Director (ED), who stated that R1 had been paying below the current market rate of $2,300 per month. ED explained that the facility had been working with R1 for several months to resolve the payment issues, including waiving several late fees. However, ED noted that R1’s payments were inconsistent and often late. ED emphasized that they did not want to evict R1 and were willing to continue working with them. ED stated that once a case is referred to the legal team, the eviction process typically takes 3–4 months. ED also clarified that the facility does not accept cash payments from residents and that R1’s payment portal would be reset to allow them to make payments online again. ED confirmed that R1 had previously been given an invoice with a breakdown of charges and stated they would ensure R1 received another copy. Based on interviews with R1 and the Executive Director, as well as a review of billing records and the eviction notice, LPA found that the facility followed proper procedures in issuing the 30-day eviction notice. The facility demonstrated efforts to work with R1 over several months, including waiving fees. Although R1 expressed concerns about communication and the payment process, there was no evidence that the eviction was unlawful. The facility provided documentation supporting the outstanding balance and issued a formal notice with a 30-day timeline, which aligns with regulatory requirements. Based on interviews and records review, there does not exist a preponderance of evidence to prove that licensee unlawfully evicted R1. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Abraham Botello. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Abraham Boello at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents. R1 stated that they pay rent on the second Wednesday of each month using their Social Security income of $2,148, which is their only source of income. R1 explained that they had a signed lease agreement with the previous owner, Atria Bonita, but had never signed a new lease with the current owner, Pacifica Senior Living. In November 2025, R1 was informed by facility staff that they owed $6,400 in past due rent. R1 requested a detailed invoice showing how the charges were calculated but had not received one at the time of the interview. R1 also reported that they had not been able to speak with the Executive Director or other administrative staff about the issue. The only communication they received was from a staff member who handed them a 30-day eviction notice and refused to answer any questions about it. R1 stated they had $4,600 available to pay toward the balance but were unable to access the facility’s online payment portal. They were told they could only pay in cash, which they found concerning and inconvenient. R1 expressed that they could no longer afford to live at the facility and, along with their daughter, were actively searching for a more affordable senior care home. R1 requested additional time to find a suitable place to move. LPA reviewed R1’s billing statements from October 31, 2024, through December 1, 2025. The records showed that R1 had accumulated an outstanding balance of $14,750 between October 2024 and March 2025. R1 made payments that reduced the balance, but as of December 1, 2025, they still owed $8,700. This amount included several late fees. LPA also reviewed R1’s signed admission agreement with Atria Bonita dated November 27, 2020. The agreement listed R1’s monthly rate as $1,495 and included a rate increase history disclosure. On November 19, 2025, CCLD received a copy of a 30-day eviction notice issued by Bonita Villa Senior Living to R1. The notice, dated November 13, 2025, stated that R1 owed $6,400 in unpaid rent from November 2024 through November 2025. The notice informed R1 that they must either pay the full balance or vacate the facility by December 15, 2025.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 17, 2025 inspection of BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on December 17, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on December 17, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.