Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 3746045444 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Serrano arrived at the facility to deliver a case management investigation report related to a fall experienced by Resident 1 (R1) on 10/20/2025 and concerns regarding the facility’s response, medical assessment practices, supervision, and change in condition procedures. LPA met with Executive Director Abraham Botello and discussed the purpose of the visit. R1 moved into the independent living area on 10/28/2020 and did not require assistance with daily activities at the time of admission. On 10/20/2025, R1 contacted the front desk and requested help after they fell inside their room. Staff 1 (S1) responded and helped R1 up from the floor. S1 stated that R1 reported hitting their head during the fall. S1 reported that R1 appeared to have no visible injuries and reportedly refused medical care. Staff 2 and Staff 3 also responded to the call but did not enter the room or assess R1 for injuries. The Department interviewed the Administrator, who stated they believed R1 had no fall history prior to the 10/20/2025 incident. The Department reviewed R1’s facility records and identified a total of nine falls dating back to January 2024 . All but one occurred in R1’s room and were unwitnessed. Three of these falls resulted in hospital transport for serious injuries, including hip injuries. Records also indicated R1 hit their head in at least two prior falls. Additional documentation showed multiple hospital transports for breathing issues and other medical conditions. The only Physician’s Report available was dated 10/1/2020 , with no updated assessments on file. The Department conducted a follow-up interview with the Administrator. The Administrator stated they had only been in their role for a few months and were unaware of R1’s fall history. The Department asked whether R1 had been re-evaluated given their repeated falls and clear changes in condition. The Administrator confirmed that no updated medical assessments existed. The Department advised the Administrator that based on the frequency of falls, injuries, and medical needs, R1 should have been considered for a higher level of care such as assisted living. The Administrator agreed. The Department’s review concluded that R1 had not been medically re-evaluated since 10/1/2020, despite multiple falls and significant medical concerns. The facility did not take steps to reduce R1’s fall risk or request a higher level of care. The Department reviewed the facility’s response to R1’s fall on 10/20/2025. S1 reported that R1 stated they hit their head. S2 and S3 responded but did not enter the room or assess R1. S1 1 claimed R1 refused medical treatment. S2 instructed S1 to monitor R1 every hour for any change in condition. The Administrator stated that while the facility has no written policy on suspected head injuries, staff are instructed to call 911 when a resident hits their head or is suspected of hitting their head. S3 confirmed this expectation. The Department interviewed R1. R1 stated they told S1 they hit their head hard and that their head and right side were hurting. R1 stated S1 did not assess them and that they did not refuse medical care. R1 stated they remained in their room for two days in pain until they contacted the front desk again. Facility records show that on 10/22/2025, S3 called 911 after R1 asked for help. The Department reviewed documentation and found no recorded hourly checks between 10/20/2025 and 10/22/2025, despite staff claiming these checks were performed. R1 also reported no staff checked on them during these dates. S3 confirmed that such monitoring should have been documented. Based on the information reviewed, the Department determined that the facility did not provide timely medical attention and did not conduct required monitoring after a reported head injury. The Department concluded that the facility failed to provide care and supervision, failed to observe and document changes in condition, and did not meet Title 22 RCFE requirements. Deficiencies were cited on LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with the Licensee's Rights (LIC9058 03/22) was provided to Abraham Botello signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87101(c)(3)Type A

    "Care and Supervision" means those activities which if provided shall require the facility to be licensed. It involves assistance as needed with activities of daily living and the assumption of varying degrees of responsibility for the safety and well-being of residents...This requirment was not met as evidenced by. The facility did not supervise R1 properly when they reported hitting their head. Staff did not assess R1, did not call 911 for a suspected head injury, and did not complete or document hourly monitoring checks. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1.

  • 87463(e)(1)Type A

    (e) The licensee shall immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, bring any significant change in condition... to the attention of the appropriate licensed medical professional... Documentation of such communication shall be added...This requirement was not met as evidenced by; The facility did not conduct reappraisals for R1 despite nine falls, multiple injuries, and hospitalizations, all of which constitute significant changes in condition. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1.

  • 87468.1(a)(16)Type A

    Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(16) To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement was not met as evidenced by. R1 did not receive timely medical evaluation or safe and healthful care after reporting a head injury. Staff failed to provide proper assessment and supervision. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1.

  • 87303(i)(1)(A)Type B
  • 87303(i)(1)(B)Type B
  • 87458(b)Type A

    (b) The licensee shall obtain an updated medical assessment when required by the Department. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; R1’s last medical assessment was dated 10/1/2020. The facility did not obtain updated assessments despite repeated falls, hospitalizations, and changes in condition. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1.

  • 87465(C)(2)Type B

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 27, 2026 inspection of BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a other inspection of BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on April 27, 2026. 4 citations were issued: 4 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to BONITA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on April 27, 2026?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (4 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: ""Care and Supervision" means those activities which if provided shall require the facility to be licensed. It involves a..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.