Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continued form LIC9099) Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. Mores specifically, that Resident #1(R1), who had a suprapubic catheter, experienced severe pain and made multiple requests for assistance, which were ignored by staff therefore R1 had to call emergency services to get help. Staff interview revealed that the resident was admitted on 09/19/2025, transferred to another building on 09/25/2025, and hospitalized on 09/28/2025. Staff confirmed R1 called emergency services due to suicidal ideation, not pain. Resident representative interview and care notes revealed that the responsible party was contacted by the facility on 10/02/2025. They also confirmed the resident called police due to suicidal thoughts and not due to pain. Records review revealed no documentation of complaints related to catheter pain. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed PRN Tylenol was administered on 09/20, 09/21, and 09/22 for general pain and discomfort. The resident was also receiving antibiotics for a UTI and Gabapentin three times daily for nerve pain. Care notes reflected no catheter-related complaints. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Associate Executive Director,Lynn Torino. A copy of this report and Licensee's Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided and their signature on this report confirms receipt of the Licensee Rights.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    87211(a)(1)(D)A written report shall be submitted to the… and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence … disposition of the case. (D)Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident…This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written report R1’s (RP) of a physical altercation involving R1 and another resident. This failure to provide timely notification occurred in 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R1), This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 27, 2025 inspection of GROSSMONT GARDENS SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of GROSSMONT GARDENS SENIOR LIVING on October 27, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GROSSMONT GARDENS SENIOR LIVING on October 27, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.