Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARELicense 3746046841 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The ED also stated there was one (1) caregiver and one (1) Medication Technician on NOC shift, and an AM staff that starts at 5:00am to assist NOC shift for one (1) hour before their shift ends. Staff interviews revealed it’s impossible to get all multiple up by breakfast if they start at 5:00am. Therefore, staff must start waking residents up as early as 3:00am to fulfill the facility’s requirement of getting the residents up and ready. Staff interviews confirmed they wake the residents up at 3:00am-3:30am to get them ready and the residents are placed in the dining room area and are falling asleep, while they wait for breakfast to be served. Residents sleep is being interfered by staff due to waking up as early as 3:00am to get ready for a 7:30am breakfast. Based on interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation was found to be substantiated. California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8 is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Executive Director, Suzette Johnson whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. It was also alleged staff do not maintain the facility in clean condition. It was reported Room #101’s carpet had blood stains and other carpets were dirty as well and not being shampooed or cleaned. On 09/06/23, LPA observed Room #101 and observed stains on the carpet along with a strong odor. The odor was intense causing the LPA to have to exit the room quickly. LPA observed other resident rooms and discovered stains and strong odors. LPA also observed all resident hallways had new flooring as the carpets were already replaced. Staff interviews revealed they had gotten used to the smell/odors, which were caused by the old carpets. Staff also confirmed the carpets were being replaced by the new owners. The Executive Director’s (ED) interview revealed the carpets were not in clean condition and needed to be replaced. The ED explained the facility had new ownership and she was new as well but was already working on replacing all the carpets with flooring. The ED explained there was a delay with replacing all the carpets with flooring due to some issues with the contractor. However, everything was now on track and Room #101’s carpet was next on the list to be replaced. All residents have a Major Neurocognitive Disorder and did not witness odors in their rooms. The ED provided proof of documentation that all resident carpets were being replaced with flooring. In addition, the ED also provided documentation to show the timeline and delays with the contractors. The ED was able to prove the work began when they took over ownership, and time was needed to replace all the carpeting. Today, LPA confirmed all residents room carpets have been replaced with flooring. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegations. The allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Executive Director, Suzette Johnson whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type B

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews the licensee did not ensure residents had comfortable accommodations for 10 out of 52 [R1-R10] residents in care which posed a potential health and personal rights risk to residents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 20, 2023 inspection of GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARE on October 20, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARE on October 20, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.