Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings and explained the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapilof. The investigation included reviews of facility and outside records, and interviews with staff and outside sources. On 2/19/2026, the Department received a complaint alleging that facility staff were not following reporting requirements, specifically that management instructed staff not to document incidents in the internal reporting system. Department interviewed multiple staff regarding reporting practices. Staff consistently described documenting incidents in the electronic system, notifying the POA, and escalating concerns as needed. Staff did not report being instructed to withhold documentation. Department review of recent in-service trainings and staff interviews reveal management has been reinforcing guidance on objective, factual documentation. Department review of incident reports, progress notes, and related documents revealed no gaps or indicators of withheld information. LPA observations and outside source interviews showed no discrepancies between staff statements, written records, or required notifications. Based upon the information obtained during the investigation it is determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violation occurred and is therefore UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with ED Angela Scott- Kapiloff and copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(i)(1)Type B

    87303 Maintenance and Operation (i)(1)Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria: All facilities licensed for 16 or more.. shall have a signal system... This requirement was not met in evidence as: Based on observation/interview/record review the licensee did not maintain a operational signal system for 60 of 60 persons in care which posed a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care

  • 87465(a)(4)Type B

    87465(a) A plan for incidental medical ...(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, one (1) out of sixty (60) residents did not receive proper assistance with thier (R1) self administered medications, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2026 inspection of GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARE on March 3, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GROSSMONT GARDENS MEMORY CARE on March 3, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.