complaint·February 27, 2026

(continue from LIC 9099) Specifically, it was alleged that facility staff did not inform R1’s responsible party of the details of the incident that led to R1 being transported via 911. A review of facility and resident records revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on February 2, 2026. At the time of admission, the only responsible party listed was the placement agency. Documentation showed that on February 3, 2026, facility staff notified the placement agency when R1 was transported to the hospital. Records further confirmed that the facility reported the incident to CCL as required. Based on the documents reviewed, the facility followed reporting requirements in accordance with Title 22 regulations. Based on observations, interviews with staff and R1, and a review of relevant facility and resident records, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the Department has determined the complaint allegation to be unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have occurred, and/or lacks a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Stephanie Valdes. A copy of this report, the Confidential Names List (LIC 811), and Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.