Complaint·May 15, 2025

(CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1, LIC 9099) Interviews with two (2) other residents also revealed that they do not believe S1 speaks to residents in an inappropriate manner. The other (2) residents also stated that they have never witnessed that S1 threaten any resident with an eviction. Interviews with Staff #2 (S2) also revealed that they have never witnessed S1 speaking inappropriately to residents or threatening any resident with eviction. An interview with outside source #1 (OS1), who advocates for R1, also revealed that they have never witnessed S1 or other staff speaking to R1 in an inappropriate manner. OS1 also stated that they did not believe that S1 threatened R1 with an eviction. An interview with outside source #2 (OS2), who also advocates for R1,revealed that OS2 believes that all staff treat the resident with respect and R1 has thrived at this facility. Even though an interview with Outside Source #3 (OS3) revealed that they believed R1 had been treated with disrespect by S1, OS2 and OS3 stated that they believed there may have been a misunderstanding. There is insufficient evidence to support this allegation. Due to a lack of corroborating evidence, the allegation that S1 speaks inappropriately to R1 and that S1 threatened R1 are unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights LIC 9058 (03/22) were provided to Rosemary.