Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

NOVELLUS CLAIREMONT LLCLicense 3746047222 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continue from LIC9099) According to the complaint, residents were receiving their medications late due to a shortage of staff available to administer them. It was reported that between February and May 2024, the facility experienced a shortage of medication technicians and direct care staff. However, no specific details were provided regarding which residents were affected or the specific dates and times when medication was administered late. Findings CCL conducted interviews with staff, residents, responsible parties, and external sources, all of which consistently corroborated both allegations. Staff interviews revealed ongoing concerns regarding inadequate direct care staffing during the period in question. Management acknowledged the use of external staffing agencies to fill gaps and compensate for staffing shortages. During visits conducted on June 3, 2024, and April 10, 2025, LPA observed the Executive Director acting as a medication technician due to staff shortages. Interviews with staff and residents confirmed that the Executive Director and other non-direct care staff were frequently reassigned to cover care shifts. As a result, medication administration was often delayed. While no adverse health outcomes were reported due to delayed medication, residents’ other care needs were not consistently met. Interviewees stated that services such as incontinence care, showering, grooming, laundry, and housekeeping were often delayed or incomplete. For example, maintenance staff were observed doing laundry, and housekeeping staff were assisting with food service duties. Management and staff indicated they were making efforts to meet residents’ needs but acknowledged that there were not enough staff available to maintain adequate care. It was further explained that the facility was experiencing challenges in remaining competitive within the industry and had to rely heavily on outside staffing agencies. As of May 2025, the facility is under new management. The current administration has prioritized increasing staffing levels to ensure resident care needs are met. Follow-up interviews with staff, residents, and external sources confirmed that current staffing is adequate. (continue at LIC9099C) (Continue from LIC9099C) Conclusion Based on the evidence obtained through observations and interviews, CCL substantiates both allegations using the preponderance of evidence standard. Deficiencies were cited under Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations and are detailed on the LIC 9099-D form. A Plan of Correction (POC) was developed in coordination with ED EJ Lewis. An exit interview was conducted with ED Lewis, who was provided with copies of this report, the LIC 9099-D Deficiency Report, and the LIC 9058 (03/22) Licensee Appeal Rights.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type B

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411(a) Personnel Requirements - GeneralFacility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the licensee failed to maintain a sufficient number of staff to meet residents’ needs. This posed a potential personal rights risk to 69 residents in care.

  • Give PRN medication by physician order

    87465(c)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental CareOnce ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews with staff and external sources, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This posed a potential health risk to 69 residents in care.

  • 87463(e)Type A

    Section 87463 (e) – ReappraisalsThe licensee shall immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, bring any significant change in condition to the attention of the appropriate licensed medical professional. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, records review, and interviews with staff and outside sources, staff neglect resulted in the resident's (R1) hospitalization. This posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to one 1 of 84 residents in care.

  • 87466Type B

    Regular observation and documentation of resident changes

    Section 87466 – Observation of the Resident. The licensee shall ensure residents are regularly observed…when changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, records review, and interviews with staff and outside sources, the licensee did not seek medical attention to meet the resident's needs (R1). This posed a potential health, safety, and personal risk to one 1 of 84 residents in care.

  • Check incontinent residents during high-risk periods

    Section 87625(b)(2) – Managed Incontinence. In addition to Section 87611, …the licensee shall be responsible for the following:Ensuring that incontinent residents are checked during those periods of time when they are known to be incontinent, including during the night. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, interviews with staff, and outside sources, the licensee did not provide incontinent care to meet R1’s needs. This posed a potential health, safety and personal 4risk to one 1 of 84 residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 30, 2025 inspection of NOVELLUS CLAIREMONT LLC?

This was a complaint inspection of NOVELLUS CLAIREMONT LLC on July 30, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to NOVELLUS CLAIREMONT LLC on July 30, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87411(a) Personnel Requirements - GeneralFacility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers and competent to..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.