Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

ALMA VIA OF SAN FRANCISCOLicense 3856002701 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 4/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of initiating a case management visit and was greeted by Executive Director, Cleitus Jones. The purpose of the case management is to address corresponding complaint investigation report number 14-AS-20240426082005. Upon further review of investigation evidence, the original complaint report (LIC9099) dated 4/2/2025 has been amended as subjected to substantiated findings. Complaint alleges facility staff did not provide proper notice of rate increase for resident (R1). Upon further review of R1’s invoices, payment ledger and rate of increase notice dated 7/31/2020; effective 10/1/2020, LPA identified inconsistencies of fee amounts charged that do not match the addendum rate. The facility also failed to include modified conditions and rate structure when in the notice in comparison to the ledger. Upon further review of R1’s invoices, payment ledger and rate of increase notice dated 4/30/2021; effective 7/1/2021, LPA identified inconsistencies of fee amounts charged that do not follow the addendum rate modified conditions and rate structure stated in the notice when in comparison to the ledger. Deficiency cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87507(g)(4)Type B

    87507(g)(4) Admissions Agreements - Modification conditions, including the requirement for the provision of at least 60 days prior written notice to the resident of any rate or rate structure change, or as soon as the licensee is notified of SSI/SSP rate changes. This requirement was not met as evidence by:** Based upon review of R1’s records of rate increase notices and payment ledger and invoices, LPA found that the facility failed to provide proper notice of rate increase that identifies modification conditions and rate structure changes in documented noticed dated 7/31/2020 and failed to follow modification conditions in documented notice dated 4/30/2021. This serves as a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 17, 2025 inspection of ALMA VIA OF SAN FRANCISCO?

This was an other inspection of ALMA VIA OF SAN FRANCISCO on April 17, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ALMA VIA OF SAN FRANCISCO on April 17, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87507(g)(4) Admissions Agreements - Modification conditions, including the requirement for the provision of at least 60 ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.