Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Concerning the facility not maintaining a comfortable temperate for residents, during the LPA's on site 10-day visit, LPA Filouane verified the facility's temperature on multiple floors in the hallways. The facility had a constant temperature reading of 68 degrees Fahrenheit. According to Title 22 regulations, a facility shall heat rooms to a minimum temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit. Title 22 regulations also state that nothing shall prohibit residents from adjusting individual thermostatic controls. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Concerning the allegation of the facility not safeguarding a resident's personal belongings, LPA Filouane reviewed the incident report submitted to CCLD along with police reports of two residents who reported their belongings were stolen. Police reported to the facility that the theft could not be substantiated as there was a lack of information, details regarding the number of items, and evidence. The resident reporting the theft could not verify additional information about the alleged stolen items to the police. The facility has a theft and loss program enacted as required by Title 22 and has reported to the required entities. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Concerning the allegation of the facility not allowing residents to choose a healthcare provider, this facility is an Assisted Living facility, which assists residents in living independently. During an interview with the DCP, the DCP stated the facility recommends a healthcare provider to residents who are from out of the area searching for healthcare but does not require a certain provider. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Concerning the allegation of staff not properly trained, LPA Filouane observed staff at work during the on-site visit. During an interview with the ED and DCP, LPA requested training records of staff members to review. LPA reviewed the training records of Licensed Vocational Nurses, Medical Technicians, and Caregivers, and LPA observed current training. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Executive Director and Director of Campus Programs.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 4, 2021 inspection of LYNNE & ROY M FRANK RESIDENCES?

This was a complaint inspection of LYNNE & ROY M FRANK RESIDENCES on June 4, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LYNNE & ROY M FRANK RESIDENCES on June 4, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.