Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from 809 C. LPA reviewed R1's monthly billing statement addressed to R1 detailed credits and debits itemized to account for ongoing outstanding balance due forward, current fees, concessions of reduced rates, changes in level of care, payments received, and automatic payments not processed. Administrator stated they have gone over the bills with R1 multiple times as the system is complicated but all credits and debits match the charges due to the facility. R2's level of care changes requested by R1 created multiple debits and credits on the same billing statement. LPA observed the bill was challenging to understand but reviewed all charges to be accurate as credits and debits balance with the total of monthly charges and payments received as recorded on balance forward, most current statement, and the rates in the admission's agreement. Three Notices of Outstanding Balance due addressed to R1 and R2 were delivered with instructions for immediate payment, instructions for disputing balance, and final notice of previous attempts to collet a debt and request to make payment in full. No eviction notices were sent. LPA observed R1 paid overdue balance in full prior to today's date after final notice was delivered. Currently R1 has a credit for overpayment on most recent billing statement due for credits for R1 and Resident two (R2) moving. R2's required assistance with bathing and medications. LPA reviewed case notes no missed assistance with showering or medications documented. Interviews concluded R2 needs were meet according to R2's care plan and staff were staffed to provide the appropriate level of care. R2's level of care was changed at R1's request. It was determined in the course of the investigation based on the information provided through documentation and interview, the aforementioned allegations are unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not meet residents needs, staff did not give resident a copy of admissions agreement, staff did not itemized a list of fees on the admissions agreement, staff are overcharging resident, and staff is threatening resident. and we have found the allegations false. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 8, no deficiencies observed or cited. Exit interview held, copy of report given.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 7, 2021 inspection of COURTYARD AT RIO LAS PALMAS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of COURTYARD AT RIO LAS PALMAS, THE on July 7, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COURTYARD AT RIO LAS PALMAS, THE on July 7, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.