Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Complaint

YANNICA GUEST HOMELicense 3927007292 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannouced on 12/12/25 at 12:00pm to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with administrator, Maxima Martine LPA asked to review the admission agreement and any attached consents signed at admission. There are videos posted to the Facebook platform by facility staff featuring the facility and two residents for which have the residents have not signed consents to participate in. Administrator Provided there was not a consent form for publishing video of the care home or its residents in the admission agreement, and was aware of the videos and asked for the staff involved to stop. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. 2 citations from the California Code of Regulations,are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of the report was read and given to staff. Appeal rights Provided, and exit interview was conducted.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 80068(f)Type B

    80068 Admission Agreements (f) Modifications to the original agreement shall be made whenever circumstances covered in the agreement change, and shall be dated and signed by the persons specified in (c) above. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: record review and interview where a consent to be have video taken for comercial purposes was not in the admission agreement.This posed a potential risk to the personal rights of the clients in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(1)Type A

    Right to personal privacy in daily care

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: record review and interview where it was learned staff making videos featuring the residents and posting to a public platform without the residents consent.This poses an immediate risk to the personal rights of the clients in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 12, 2025 inspection of YANNICA GUEST HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of YANNICA GUEST HOME on December 12, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to YANNICA GUEST HOME on December 12, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "80068 Admission Agreements (f) Modifications to the original agreement shall be made whenever circumstances covered in ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.