Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

A1 DEL MONTE STOCKTONLicense 3927009934 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Amended from original report dated 12-9-21: Based on interview with S1 and observation, it was determined that 32 residents reside in memory care with 12 residents identified as fall risk residents. Upon LPAs review of actual hours worked by caregivers, it was determined that three caregivers were on duty during the night shift on 10-26-21 until the morning of 10-27-21. Upon further review it was determined that S2 began shift at 10:25pm and clocked out at 7:00am, S3 began shift at 8:00pm and clocked out at 3:30am, S4 began shift at 10:15pm and clocked out at 7:00am. LPA reviewed staffing schedule on 11-17-21 and interviewed S1, which reveals 3 caregivers scheduled to work during the hours of 10:30pm to 7:00am on 10-26-21 until the morning of 10-27-21. Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews it is determined that R1 resides in memory care and fell at 5:00am on 10-27-21 and sustained injuries, and upon further review, determined that only one staff was on duty in memory care and one staff was on duty in assisted living at the time of R1’s fall and without the presence of additional staff member previously on duty. Incident report states this fall was unwitnessed. Therefore, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Allegation #2: Reporting party not notified of fall: LPA reviewed incident report for R1 dated 10-28-21. Based on review of incident report, there is no indication of responsible party being notified of fall incident occurring on 10-27-21 at 5:00am. Interviews with responsible person for R1 revealed no contact was made to responsible party in writing after the fall noted above. Interview with S1 revealed that it could not be confirmed if responsible party was notified of all noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Allegation #3: Reappraisal not completed for change of condition: LPA reviewed appraisal forms for R1 on 11-17-21. An appraisal needs and service plan for R1 was observed by LPA to be dated 2-19-21 with no update regarding fall precautions relating to the fall of R1 which occurred on 10-27-21 at 5:00am. A reappraisal form for R1 was requested on 11-17-21 and was not located in R1s record. Based on record review and observation, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Allegation #4: Documents not provided to POA upon request. LPA conducted interviews with S1, and responsible person for R1. Based on interviews conducted, it was determined that a request for records relating to information on R1s fall on 10-27-21 at 5:00am was made by responsible person on 11-1-21 and not received by responsible person for R1 until 11-19-21. Based on interviews conducted, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. As a result of today’s visit and the findings noted above, deficiencies are cited under Title 22, division 6. An exit interview was conducted with Jenna Silva and a copy of this report was left with Jenna. Appeal rights provided.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 80069(a)Type B

    Client Medical Assessment. Except for licensees of ARFs, prior to or within 30 calendar days following the acceptance of a client, the licensee shall obtain a written medical assessment of the client…The requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, physician’s report from R1’s chart was absent and not obtained. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(B)Type B

    Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish….reports as the Department may require…(1) A written report shall be submitted…to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence…(B) Any serious injury….occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on interviews and record review, responsible person for R1 was not notified in writing of fall that occurred on 10-27-21 at 5:00am within seven days of occurrence. This poses a potential health, safety, and resident rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Ammended from original report dated 12-9-21: Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews, interviews, and observation, R1 sustained a fall with injury...Licensee did not ensure R1 received appropriate care and supervision due to inadequate staff coverage. This poses an immediate health, safety, and resident rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87463(a)Type B

    Reappraisals. (a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated in writing…as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, facility did not update an appraisal form for R1 to address fall precautions and a fall event of R1 which occurred on 10-27-21 at 5:00am. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(9)Type B

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have…the following rights: (9) To have communications to the licensee from their representatives answered promptly and appropriately. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, Licensee did not ensure responsible person for R1 was answered promptly when requesting documents relating to a fall event for R1. Documents were requested on 11-1-21 and not received until 11-19-21. This poses a potential health, safety, and resident rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 9, 2021 inspection of A1 DEL MONTE STOCKTON?

This was a complaint inspection of A1 DEL MONTE STOCKTON on December 9, 2021. 4 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to A1 DEL MONTE STOCKTON on December 9, 2021?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (1 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "Client Medical Assessment. Except for licensees of ARFs, prior to or within 30 calendar days following the acceptance of..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.