Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

VILLAGE AT SYDNEY CREEK, THELicense 4058005771 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

S3 says that residents have higher needs and there are “four heavy wetters who need changing every hour, others who need changing every two hours, and two residents who need a two-person assist.” S4 reports that there are two caregivers and one concierge per neighborhood and that “one to two times per month, we need more concierge in events.” S4 further explains that “At times, it is hectic, and we need more people.” S5 says there are “16-18 residents, 3 PCAs, and 1 concierge.” S5 explains that “3-4 staff work double shifts almost every day.” S6 says they work double shifts 2-3 times each week and that “lately it’s been worse.” S6 describes the situation, saying “new people quit quickly.” S7 explains that there are “a lot of people working double shifts since January 2021, at least 2-3 staff working double shifts daily.” On 9/17/21 at 3:07 pm, LPA interviewed Witness #1 (W1). W1 says that they had to “train the staff on mom’s needs, i.e. changing her (diaper) regularly, feeding her properly and feeding her regularly, turning her, showering her.” W1 stated that they “were not taking care of her due to a shortage in staff, new staff not being trained fully, and too few caregivers to get the job done.” On 7/21/22 between 2:15 pm and 2:59 pm, LPA interviewed Staff #8 (S8) and Staff # (S9). S8 says regarding incontinent needs that “It’s happened (residents not getting changed) about three times in the past 10 years.” S9 says they observed “Two staff who did not attend to residents’ toileting needs for more 30 minutes.” S9 further explains that “Staff are tired from working double shifts, and sometimes they don’t tend to residents’ needs.” On 7/22/22 between 9:55 am and 10:45 am, LPA interviewed Staff #10 (S10) and Staff #11 (S11). S10 reports that it is discussed with staff in crossover meetings. S10 says they do not know of any staff who had problems with changing residents’ diapers. S11 says “It happens sometimes. Staff may be helping other residents,” and S11 says they do not recall any staff in particular who did this. On 8/11/22 at 1:22 pm, LPA spoke with Witness #2 (W2). W2 says that their mother is “Typically is taken care of, however, her teeth bothered her, and staff don’t really assist with brushing her teeth.” W2 explains “Her hair looks terrible. Staff does a great job considering I don’t think they have enough people.” Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation “Staff not meeting residents care needs” is deemed Substantiated at this time. Interviews reveal that there was a staffing shortage, and residents were not being cared for in a timely manner. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, and a copy of the report and appeal rights emailed to the administrator. On 9/17/21 at 3:07 pm, LPA interviewed Witness #1 (W1). W1 says their mother “has not had any falls, bruises, or skin tears while at the facility.” On 8/11/22 between 10:50 am and 1:22 pm, LPA interviewed Witness #3 (W3) and Witness #4 (W4). W3 says “Mom has fallen a couple of times and both times, staff called W3 immediately.” W4 says “As people age, people fall.” W4 says “Staff know the residents who need assistance. My sister hasn’t had any falls.” On 9/12/22, LPA reviewed the facility’s incident reports for falls between September 2020 and September 2021. There were twenty-five (25) falls, an average two (2) per month. Skin tears were noted on two of the incident reports. Based on evidence obtained, the allegation “Staff not supervising residents resulting in fall sustaining bruises,” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Interviews and records review indicate that residents did not have an unusually high number of falls prior to the complaint, and bruising was not a significant factor mentioned in interviews. There does not appear to be a lack of supervision at this time nor an excessive amount of falls given resident medical conditions. On the allegation “Staff left residents in soiled clothing for extended period of time resulting in rashes,” the complainant’s concern was that “multiple residents are left in soiled diapers for up to 5 to 6 hours resulting in rashes.” To investigate, LPA interviewed the staff and witnesses. On 9/17/21 at 3:07 pm, LPA interviewed W1. W1 says when their mother first arrived at the facility, W1 had to “train the staff on mom’s needs, i.e. changing her (diaper) regularly.” W1 says “now, she is being taken care of.” On 9/13/21 between 12:20 pm and 12:30 pm, LPA interviewed Staff #4 (S4) and Staff #5 (S5). Both staff say they have never seen rashes on residents. On 7/21/22 between 1:34 pm and 2:59 pm, LPA interviewed three staff. All three staff reported that some residents may have been left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time but did not indicate that residents received rashes from this. On 7/22/22 between 9:55 am and 10:45 am, LPA interviewed two staff. Staff say they hadn’t witnessed a problem. They say residents sometimes sit in soiled clothing for an extended period of time, however, no rashes were reported. Continued on 9099-C Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation “Staff left residents in soiled clothing for extended period of time resulting in rashes,” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. There is no evidence to suggest residents were acquiring rashes, however, the facility was cited on 8/25/22 for residents being left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. On the allegation “Food service not provided to residents,” the complainant was concerned that “residents are not provided dinner and are put to bed at 6:00 – 6:30 pm.” To investigate, LPA interviewed staff and witnesses. On 9/13/21 between 12:08 pm and 1:54 pm, LPA interviewed Staff #3 (S3), S4, S5, S6, and S7. S3 says they “always make a sandwich in the kitchen and place it in the refrigerator, if a resident’s not there to eat.” S3 explains that there are extra snacks available to residents and that the common areas have water pitchers and coffee available on the kitchen counters. S3 says sometimes they feed residents in bed. S4, S5, S6, and S7 say that if a resident misses a meal, staff put the resident’s plate of food in the refrigerator with the resident’s name and date and say it is saved for the resident to eat later. Staff said that residents occasionally go to bed early, but that is not typical. On 9/13/21 at 11:35 am, LPA toured the facility. LPA observed food service to be adequate. The kitchen was fully stocked with food, and staff were preparing and delivering meals to resident neighborhoods. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation “Food service not provided to residents,” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Interviews indicate that staff are setting aside resident meals, if they are not available at meal time, and food is provided to residents. Exit interview conducted and the report emailed to the administrator.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Safe, healthful, comfortable accommodations

    87468.1(a)(2) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the facility did not ensure that adequate personal hygiene measures were in place to keep residents healthy which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 14, 2022 inspection of VILLAGE AT SYDNEY CREEK, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLAGE AT SYDNEY CREEK, THE on September 14, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to VILLAGE AT SYDNEY CREEK, THE on September 14, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1(a)(2) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the e..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.