Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

C.A.L.L.-CARMELITA HOUSELicense 405801701
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Administrator stated they had not heard about a staff refusing water to a resident, and stated staff never refuse water. Administrator noted one resident always like to drink water, and they place bottled water in resident’s rooms. Staff interviewed stated they had not observed staff refuse water to any clients, and stated “we give clients what they ask for.” Clients in the home were interviewed, and were unable to provide feedback on their care. LPA interviewed a credible witness, who stated at the time of this complaint they had not heard of staff not providing clients water. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation: Staff are handling resident(s) in a rough manner while in care. It was alleged on 7/30/2023, S1 bragged about dragging C1 out of another client’s room by their feet, from a distance from the bed to the doorway. Allegedly, S1 stated no matter what they do, the facility will not fire them. A credible witness also spoke with staff, who indicated C1 sometimes needs assistance leaving other client’s rooms, but is compliant when escorted out by staff. All staff denied rough handling to the credible witness. ED stated they reviewed video footage in the facility for dates 8/3/2023 through 8/9/2023, and did not observe anything concerning and no indications on the video footage C1 was dragged. However, ED observed footage that another client (C3) tripped on 8/30/2023, put their hand out on a door jamb, and dislocated their finger, even though staff were right behind C3. Staff interviewed stated they had never witnessed staff pulling a client or handling a client in a rough manner. Staff stated if that were to happen, they would report it to a lead or supervisor, and create documentation or an incident report. Clients in the home were interviewed, and were unable to provide feedback on their care. LPA interviewed a credible witness, who stated at the time of this complaint they had not heard of staff handling residents in a rough manner. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Continued on 9099-C On the allegation: Facility did not report alleged abuse. It was alleged the behaviors of S1 were reported to facility Human Resources (HR) and management, but the alleged abuse was not reported. Administrator stated they were not aware of any abuse in the facility, and do not believe any rough handling occurred. Administrator stated staff would report the abuse. Staff interviewed stated they had never witnessed staff pulling a client or handling a client in a rough manner. Staff stated if that were to happen, they would report it to a lead or supervisor, and create documentation or an incident report. Administrator stated S2 was not caring about the quality of care and they were let go after another staff reported the performance issues. On this complaint, there was insufficient evidence to substantiate that abuse occurred, and therefore insufficient evidence to prove it was not reported. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report given.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type A

    87468.1(a)(1) Personal Rights. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff,... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when S1 yelled at residents in care, which posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type A

    87468.2(a)(4) Personal Rights. To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in...qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when S1 deviated from protocol and had R2 sit on their

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 29, 2024 inspection of C.A.L.L.-CARMELITA HOUSE?

This was a complaint inspection of C.A.L.L.-CARMELITA HOUSE on October 29, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to C.A.L.L.-CARMELITA HOUSE on October 29, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.