Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

C.A.L.L. - VALDEZ HOUSELicense 405802280
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

R1 had a surgery procedure of Prostate Transurethral Vaporization and returned to the facility with orders to proceed as normal, on 12/21/2022 R1 had surgery follow up visit, no issues reported. On 01/22/2023 R1 had a mobile dental hygiene visit. On 01/31/2023, R1 had an appointment with Urologist Dr. Perkins, who documented, “symptoms of decline” related to R1’s surgery on 12/19/2023. Interviews on 03/06/2023 of Staff 1 and 3 (S1, S3) indicated that R1 had maintained a baseline upon returning from surgery in January and never improved and declined gradually, despite being on antibiotics. S3 stated that R1 gradually declined and was taken to the Emergency Room (ER) on 02/09/2023 where R1 was diagnosed with a bladder urinary tract infection (UTI) then cleared by the ER to return to the facility. On 02/18/2023, S3 noticed increasing symptoms and took R1 to the ER, where R1 was admitted to the Hospital for observations. On 03/19/2023, R1 was placed on Hospice Care through Central Coast Hospice. On 03/31/2023, R1 succumbed to their illness and passed away on 03/31/2023. Additionally, facility documentation included daily temperature checks, medication checks, and sunscreen checks from January 2021 through February of 2023 excluding days spent in hospitalization. LPA noted that the decline in R1 due to of complications from the bladder infection based on documentation, medical assessments and staff interviews indicated a gradual decline in R1’s baseline ADL’s. Documentation, medical appointments, and Emergency Room visits show evidence of staff seeking medical attention in a timely manner due to the nature of the decline of R1. Additionally, LPA Jeffries contacted Tri Counties Regional Center and no significant findings in R1’s care at this facility from TCRC. . At this time there is not enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Facility staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for resident in care.” and is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.626(a)(1)Type A

    1569.626 Training requirements for direct care staff (a) All residential care facilities for the elderly shall meet the following training requirements, as described in Section 1569.625, for all direct care staff:(1) Twelve hours of dementia care training, six of which shall be completed before a staff member begins working independently with residents, … This requirement was not met by S1 being left alone and not properly trained, which poses an immediate danger to residents in care.

  • 87303(a)(1)Type A

    87303 Maintenance and Operation(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.(1) Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition. This requirement was not met by evidence of black mold in the bathroom which poses an immediate danger to residents in care.

  • 87411(a)Type B

    87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet residents’ needs. This requirement was not met by evidence of time sheets and interviews that on at least 5 to 15 occasions there was only one staff without basic regulated training was on shift during 7am to 10am which puts resident in immediate danger.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 26, 2024 inspection of C.A.L.L. - VALDEZ HOUSE?

This was a complaint inspection of C.A.L.L. - VALDEZ HOUSE on January 26, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to C.A.L.L. - VALDEZ HOUSE on January 26, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.