Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THELicense 4058504802 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

S1 stated that the prior Resident Service Director had shredded R1’s Centrally Stored Medication Records (CSMR) and could not produce those records as requested by LPA Jeffries. S1 did have Medication Administration Records (MAR) for R1 and were reviewed by S1, Facility Administrator, Carl Meyer, and LPA that shows which medications were administered as prescribed. On 01/30/2025, Facility Administrator and LPA conducted a documented medication audit comparing Medication Prescriptions, Medication Invoices, MAR dates and times and the physical medications that were returned to F1 upon R1’s exit of the facility. That Medication and Document audit showed that for medication 1(Md1) there were 450 total pills sent to the facility, and 18 were returned to F1 indicating that there were approximately 30 pills over the number of MARs indicated. For medication 2 (Md2), there were 450 pills provide to the facility with 106 pills returned to F1, indicating 344 MAR as indicated which is approximately 54 pills of medication there were not administered despite MAR indicating those pills were administered to R1 on facility MAR. There were 540 pills of medication 3 (Md3) that were provided to the facility, and 176 were returned to F1, indicating 346 MARs indicated, which is approximately 56 pills that were not administered when MAR indicated they were administered to R1. There were 540 pills of medication 4 (Md4) provided to the facility, and 245 were returned to F1 indicating there were approximately 103 pills that were not administered to R1. There were 450 pills of medication 5 (Md5) that were sent to the facility, and 365 pills returned to F1, which is approximately 83 pills that were not administered to R1. LPA noted that on 01/29/2025 and 01/31/2025 physical medication counts were conducted with no discrepancy in count of the numbers of pills returned to F1, before and prior to the full medication audit to ensure accuracy. At this time there is enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Staff did not administer residents’ medication.” and is substantiated at this time. Exit interview, report read, citation issued, appeal rights and report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(1)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care ... (1)The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. The requirement was not met by evidence of R1 missing hundreds of medication passes which puts the Resident in immanent danger.

  • 87465(a)(6)Type A

    (a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (6)When requested by the prescribing physician or the Department, a record of dosages of medications which are centrally stored shall be maintained by the facility. By evidence of S1 stating that R1's Centraly Stored Medication Records (CSMR) had been shreeded, which poses in immanent danger to Resident in care.

  • 87265(b)(3)Type B

    87625 Managed Incontinence (b)…Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following:(3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement was not met by evidence of “ammonia like smell” in R1’s room and poses a potential risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 27, 2025 inspection of OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THE on February 27, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THE on February 27, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each fac..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.