Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THELicense 4058504802 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 9/4/2025 at 10:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Case Management – Incident visit. LPA met with Administrator Carl Meyer and explained the purpose of the visit. On 9/2/2025 at 5:20pm Community Care Licensing (CCL) received an incident report via email from the facility stating that on 8/24/2025 at approximately 10:15am Resident #1 (R1) was reported missing. R1 was last seen walking out the back door by Staff #1 (S1). A staff-wide search was initiated and approximately 30 minutes later R1 was found at Kennedy Club Fitness. LPA record review of R1’s LIC602A Physician’s Report indicates R1 is diagnosed with dementia and is not able to leave the facility unassisted. R1 resides in Compass Rose, the facilities memory care unit. LPA toured the memory care unit with Staff #2 (S2) ensuring the 4 doors in memory care with egress devices are functioning properly. S1 is an agency staff brought in by the facility to cover open shifts. S1 was assigned to work in Compass Rose on 8/24/2025. Staff interviews reveal that S1 told other staff that R1 was trying to exit the egress door in the back of the unit leading to the parking lot. When S1 attempted to redirect R1, R1 began to hit S1 and S1 let R1 out of the facility through that door. Interviews revealed S1 changed their story multiple times and the timing of how long they let R1 out the door ranged from ten seconds to thirty minutes. At approximately 10:15am when S1 told other staff what happened the other staff notified lead staff on duty, Staff #3 (S3). S3 activated the facilities elopement protocol and a facility search began inside and outside the facility. S3 notified the administrator at 10:24am. (Continued on LIC809-C) S3 called R1's responsible person and left a voicemail. At approximately 10:45am Kennedy Club Fitness called the local police to assist R1. When the police arrived they called the facility to see if R1 lived here and the police returned R1 to the facility. Not long after R1's returned to the facility R1's responsible person arrived and facility staff reviewed the incident with them. Administrator admitted no one notified the licensing agency Officer of the Day, by telephone, e-mail, fax, or hand-delivery no later than the next working day following the incident. The first notification to CCL was the emailed incident report dated 9/2/2025 at 5:20pm, nine days after the incident. LPA conducted a visit to the facility on 8/27/2025 and Administrator did not mention the elopement then. When asked why CCL had not been notified per Title 22 regulation the Administrator admitted he must have overlooked it. Administrator and S2 state the four egress doors in Compass Rose are checked to ensure proper functioning monthly. Per facility protocol a monthly elopement drill is conducted with staff and record review shows the facility conducted drills following the incident and the previous two were conducted on 7/31/2025 and 6/26/2025. Record review of S1's training from the agency does not list any dementia training and the facility was unable to provide dementia training for S1 meeting the Health and Safety Code requirements. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited on LIC809-D pages, report signed, appeal rights and report provided to Administrator.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.625(b)(2)Type B

    Staff training; legislative findings; contents(b)(2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not ensure S1 was provided dementia training prior to working in the memory care unit which poses a potential Health and Safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87705(e)(6)(B)Type B

    Care of Persons with Dementia (e)Licensees that use delayed egress devices on exterior doors…shall meet the following…continuing requirements: (6)For each incident of elopement…the licensee shall report the incident to: (B)The licensing agency Officer of the Day…no later than the next working day following the incident... This requirement was not met as evidenced by:Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not notify the licensing agency until nine days after the incident which poses a potential Health and Safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 4, 2025 inspection of OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THE?

This was a other inspection of OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THE on September 4, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to OAKS AT PASO ROBLES, THE on September 4, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Staff training; legislative findings; contents(b)(2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also incl..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.