Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

SAN CARLOS ELMSLicense 415600135
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On October 18, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on a substantiated complaint number: 14-AS-20190327094949, regarding an allegation that staff failed to provide care, supervision, and services to meet the needs of Resident 1(R1) resulting in R1 sustaining multiple injuries. LPA met with Administrator, Scott Evans and explained the purpose of the visit. On November 26, 2019, the Department concluded a complaint investigation and the allegation was substantiated, and the licensee was cited for violating California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, § “87468.2(a)(4)” Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities for facility failing to provide care, supervision and services that met R1's needs that resulted in R1 sustaining serious bodily injury. The investigation revealed that the plan of care for R1 was not individualized to tailor fit R1’s needs. Furthermore, R1’s hospitalization dated January 16, 2018, indicated R1 has a diagnosis of gait disorder and the physical therapist (PT) assessment notes dated March 1, 2018, identified R1 as high-risk for falls. The facility did not reassess the resident to develop a plan of care to meet R1’s needs. R1 had three separate incidents at the facility. On April 26, 2018, R1 was found on the floor and sustained a large skin tear to the left arm. On August 9, 2018, R1 stood up, fell on the floor, and sustained a fracture to the right hip. R1 was hospitalized and had surgery for a right hip fracture. Per document review and Administrator interview, there was insufficient staffing with only one staff on duty and that staff was assisting another client when R1 had the first two falls. The third incident was discovered when R1 was noted with back and leg pain on October 4, 2018. R1 continued to report pain during the night and continued to the next day. On October 5, 2018, around 2:00 p.m., R1 was reported to be in severe pain, and staff called R1’s family member and informed them the facility would call an ambulance to transfer R1 to the ER for evaluation. Two hours later at 4:00 p.m., the facility called an ambulance to transfer R1 to the ER. R1 was taken to the ER and R1 was diagnosed with a compression fracture in their back and a left hip fracture. (CONT. TO 809C) Based on interviews and record review, the facility was aware of R1’s risk for falls. However, the facility did not reassess R1 to update R1’s plan of care. The facility failed to reassess R1’s plan of care after the falls on April 26, 2018, and August 9, 2018. At the time of the complaint visit, on November 26, 2019, an immediate civil penalty of $500 was issued. The licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty was being determined and might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that an additional civil penalty is warranted for a violation that resulted in R1 sustaining serious bodily injuries while under the care of this facility. Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.67, defines serious bodily injury as “an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation.” This is evidenced by the licensee failing to provide proper care, supervision and services, which resulted in R1 sustaining multiple falls and injuries, that included a left hip fracture and a right hip fracture, which are serious bodily injuries. Today, October 18, 2023, the Department is issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code 1569.49 for a violation that the Department constitutes as serious bodily injury in the amount of $10,000.00. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500.00 was previously issued on November 26, 2019, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9,500.00. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to Administrator, Scott Evans and originals were signed. Exit interview conducted with Administrator. A copy of the report issued. Appeal Rights provided. Administrator, Scott Evans signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC 421D.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411 Personnel Requirements - General: (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs…Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation reviewed, and interviews conducted, it was acknowledged by the administrator that there are normally 3-4 caregivers that work NOC shift, however the night of 5/27/2023, there were only three staff members, one of which comprised of one administrative/clerical staff.

  • 87405(h)Type A

    87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties: (h) The administrator shall have the responsibility to: (3) Develop an administrative plan and procedures to ensure clear definition of lines of responsibility, equitable workloads, and adequate supervision.Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, S1 did not have any formal caregiving training to be able to provide care to residents at the facility, however approved to be a last-minute caregiver without adequate supervision. Nevertheless, S1 was able to sexually abuse R1 and R2 during his/her NOC shift on 5/27/2023.

  • 87411(d)Type A

    On-the-job training requirements

    87411 Personnel Requirements - General: (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This training and/or related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following, as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance:Violation of this regulation is evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, S2 and S3 acknowledged that S1 did not have any formal caregiving training and lacked caregiving experience, however S1 was approved by S2 and S3 for overtime as a last-minute caregiver during the NOC shift on 5/27/2023.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 18, 2023 inspection of SAN CARLOS ELMS?

This was an other inspection of SAN CARLOS ELMS on October 18, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SAN CARLOS ELMS on October 18, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.