Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

WRIGHT PLACE, THELicense 4156002672 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Marrufo obtained a document from the East Palo Alto Sanitary District board meeting held on 10/15/2018. The document states the East Palo Alto Sanitary Board paid $560 to “Joann Wright Catering” for “Catering Services for 10/14/18 RBM and 10/10/18 SBM.” The address for “Joann Wright Catering” is stated in the document as 2525 Annapolis St. East Palo Alto, CA 94303. During interview on 08/24/2023, ADM stated that “RBM” stands for “Regular Board Meeting” and “SBM” stands for Special Board Meeting.” ADM stated to have provided catering services for the East Palo Alto Sanitary District and to have prepared the home in the facility kitchen. ADM stated to have been paid for catering services for businesses throughout East Palo Alto. Based on records review and interviews with residents and staff, there is preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur. Therefore, the allegations are substantiated. See 9099-D for deficiencies cited per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with ADM Wright and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. R1’s Physician’s Report states R1 requires a special Consistent or Controlled Carbohydrate (CCHO) diet. ADM provided LPA Marrufo with R2’s Physician’s Report, which only included the first 2 out of 6 pages and was missing the page that indicates if R2 requires a special diet. R2’s Discharge Medication form from a skilled nursing facility on 09/08/2019 indicated R2 was ordered a CCHO diet. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of a letter from R1’s family stating what food they requested be served to R1. During interview on 08/24/2023, ADM stated to have followed the food recommendations provided by the family in the letter. ADM also stated to have provided soft foods for R2. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegations listed above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 This report was reviewed with ADM Wright and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87205(a)Type A

    Licensee must supervise facility operations

    87205 Accountability of Licensing Governing Body(a): The licensee, whether an individual or other entity, shall exercise general supervision over the affairs of the licensed facility and establish policies concerning its operation in conformance with these regulations and the welfare of the individuals it serves. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee/Administrator has operated a catering service business at the facility, which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(e)Type A

    Require physician order and label for PRN medication

    87465(e) Incidental Medical and Dental Care For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication. Both the physician's order and the label shall contain at least all of the following information. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: ADM Wright provided R1 with a supplement not prescribed by R1's physician, which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87629(a)Type A

    87629 Injections (a): The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who requires intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intradermal injections if the injections are administered by the resident or by an appropriately skilled professional. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Administrator stated to have administered R1 with injection medication, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 24, 2023 inspection of WRIGHT PLACE, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of WRIGHT PLACE, THE on August 24, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to WRIGHT PLACE, THE on August 24, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87205 Accountability of Licensing Governing Body(a): The licensee, whether an individual or other entity, shall exercise..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.