Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding to the allegation of facility staff are not ensuring that incontinent residents are kept cleaned, the reporting party stated that resident #1 (R1) is only being changed 2x/day. As part of the investigation, LPA conducted observation, interviewed staff, visiting home health licensed professional, and other residents. During LPA's visit on 8/14/2024, LPA observed R1 who was laying in bed, appeared with bright affect, and cleaned. According to staff, they changed R1 2-3x/day and as needed. They also stated that they checked on R1 several times a day to make sure R1 was cleaned and dry. According to the visiting home health licensed professional, R1 was always cleaned and dry during their visits. The other residents stated that facility staff are cleaning and changing them when needed and sometimes it took a little longer when they were busy. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of- facility staff are withholding fluids to control incontinence, the reporting party stated R1 was not being provided with water/fluids and the responsible party has to provided during visits. As part of the investigation, LPA conducted observation, interviewed R1, other residents and staff. During LPA's visit on 8/14/2024, LPA observed R1's water bottles were placed in R1's room and other residents have their water bottles next to their beds as well. According to staff, R1 needed assistance with drinking water so they placed the water bottles in the room and offered it during meals, and through-out the day. The also stated that they would fill-up all the resident's water bottles when needed. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that staff would ensure that he/she has water through-out the day and the other residents also stated that they always have water next to their beds. After the investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of- facility staff are not properly trained resulting in injuries to the resident, the reporting party stated that R1's responsible party noted bruises on R1's fingers and arms. As part of the investigation, LPA reviewed staff training records, R1's medical records, interviewed staff, administrator, and other residents. LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the allegation and stated R1 has been at the facility for several years and the responsible party has not reported that staff was not trained resulting bruises on R1's fingers and arms. In addition, the administrator stated that facility staff members are experienced and trained to care for the residents. LPA interviewed staff member who denied the allegation and stated that they have been caring for R1 for many years and they were familiar with R1's skin condition, medications, daily routines, etc. They stated that R1 is at risk for bruises due to a medication that R1 is taking and has been taking it for many years. LPA interviewed the visiting home health licensed professional who stated that R1 was prone to bruises/skin discoloration due to age and a medication that R1 was taking. The home health licensed professional also stated that based on his/her observation, facility staff members were competent and trained to care for the residents and they were providing good care. LPA interviewed other residents and they stated that staff members were professional, caring and knowledgeable of their jobs. Based on the training records provided by the facility, LPA observed facility staff completed their annual training. Based on R1's Centrally Stored Medication And Destruction Record, LPA observed R1 is taking the medication that was reported by the staff and according to Mayo Clinic, one of the side affects of this medication is bruising or purple areas on the skin. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report is reviewed and discussed with the caregiver, Mila De Villa.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 19, 2024 inspection of ARAVILLE RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME II?

This was a complaint inspection of ARAVILLE RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME II on September 19, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ARAVILLE RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME II on September 19, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.