Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - BELMONT HILLSLicense 4156008692 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

S2 who was on the AM shift admitted that he/she should have called 911 immediately after resident had a fall and complained of pain, however indicated because resident was not in severe pain, S2 did not call 911. S1 who was on shift during the PM shift, indicated he/she was not sure why the facility did not send R1 to the hospital after the fall in the morning. The facility did not send R1 out to the hospital till about 5:30pm when R1 started moaning, complaining of pain, and couldn't move his/her legs. Based on medical records reviewed, due to the fall, R1 sustained a left hip fracture. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Failure to correct said deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. AN IMMEDIATE CIVIL PENALTY OF $500.00 WAS ASSESSED TODAY: $500 FOR THE VIOLATION AS STAFF DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR A RESIDENT. THE ADMINISTRATOR WAS INFORMED THAT AN ADDITIONAL CIVIL PENALTY IS STILL BEING DETERMINED AND MIGHT BE ASSESSED BASED ON HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE §1569.49. According to the administrator and the Director of Health Services, the facility's protocol is to have the shift nurse call responsible parties regarding incidents that occur before they leave their shift. The facility did notify R1's responsible party based on interview conducted with S2, administrator and Director of Health Services. Based on care notes reviewed, it was observed that S2 did contact R1's responsible party. Based on the above information, the Department has found that this allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that this allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)Type A

    Develop required incidental medical care plan

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care - (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to seek timely medical attention after R1 had a fall and complained of pain. Based on interviews and records reviewed, R1 had a fall at 11am and R1 was not sent out to the hospital till about 5:30pm. Based on interview conducted with S2, S2 admitted that 911 should have been called immediately after R1 had a fall and complained of pain, however indicated because resident was not in severe pain, S2 did not call 911. Nevertheless, R1 complained to 3 staff members of pain and observed by staff of having pain and the facility did not seek medical attention for R1 which poses an immediate health risks to residents in care and resulted into a left hip fracture.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87465(g)Type A

    Call 9-1-1 for imminent health threats

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2)... This regulation is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to seek timely medical attention after R1 fell and immediately complained of pain. Staff interviewed admitted that R1 needed to go to the hospital but chose to wait stating R1 was not in enough pain. R1 had a severe injury and could not move their leg. Staff left R1 to endure pain for hours from approximately 11am to 5:30pm without seeking emergency medical services which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 25, 2025 inspection of SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - BELMONT HILLS?

This was a complaint inspection of SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - BELMONT HILLS on February 25, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - BELMONT HILLS on February 25, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care - (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.