Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up

TROUSDALE, THELicense 4156010151 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Jeung met with business services manager and memory care coordinator in response to Report of Suspected Abuse dated 5/22/23 regarding client #1 and private companion, and submitted to CCLD. LPA was advised that private companion was removed from facility on 5/23/23. Based on wishes of family, private companion was allowed to resume companionship to client as of 5/31/23. It is unknown what, if any, additional training was provided to private companion by caregiver agency. LPA reviewed file for client #1. In the admission agreement, pages 57, 58, 59 pertain to third party caregivers--Acknowledgement and Indemnification, Rules of Conduct for Third Party Caregivers--but the acknowledgement was not signed by the private companion, nor can it be confirmed that these documents were given to or acknowledged by private companion of client #1. This person also does not have criminal record clearance and association to facility. LPA recommended that private attendants be required to acknowledge and sign Personal Rights forms LIC613C/LIC613C2 when providing services to facility clients. Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is cited on a following page.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87355(e)(2)Type A

    Obtain required California clearance or exemption

    CRIMINAL RECORD CLEARANCEAll individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility, request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) This requirement was not met, as staff 1, who is a private companion to client 1, does not have criminal record clearance associated to facility. Licensee failed to ensure that persons with client contact maintain criminal record clearance and association with facility, which poses a health, safety or personal rights risk.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 17, 2023 inspection of TROUSDALE, THE?

This was an other inspection of TROUSDALE, THE on July 17, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to TROUSDALE, THE on July 17, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "CRIMINAL RECORD CLEARANCEAll individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.