Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 4156010461 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the visit, LPA observed residents, attempted to interview residents and interviewed staff. LPA attempted to interview five residents, however due to their dementia, they were unable to answer questions or provide any information regarding the allegation. Residents observed were in clean clothes, and did not have a urine odor. Based on staff interviewed, staff changes residents 2-3x a day; before breakfast, after lunch and before bed. Staff indicated that they may change residents less or more often depending on the resident's service plan. According to staff, if residents soiled their diapers/clothes, staff would immediately check on the resident and change them if required. Regarding the allegation, staff did not adequately address a change in resident’s condition, according to the reporting party, R1 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 and was assessed as needing Level 2 care, however in June 2024, the facility reassessed R1 and indicated R1 is now Level 4 care. During the investigation, LPA requested to review R1's file, however LPA did not observe any completed reappraisals, service plans, or pre-appraisal appraisal. According to the Administrator, he was not the administrator at the time of the incident. In addition, according to the Resident Services Director, she is unsure why the file is incomplete as she was not employed at the facility when R1 was admitted. Regarding the allegation staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident, according to the reporting party, R1 was found not responding to stimulus and was transported to the hospital. During the investigation, LPA reviewed documents and interviewed staff. According to the Resident Services Director, on July 4, 2024 at around 12pm, R1 was walking towards his/her room with R1’s responsible party when R1 suddenly became unresponsive. Med-tech and Resident Services Director immediately came to assist R1 and check his/her vitals. 911 was called and paramedics came to the facility at 12:05pm and transported R1 to the hospital. Regarding the allegation staff did not assist resident with repositioning, according to the reporting party, during multiple visits conducted, it was found that R1 was left unattended on a wheel chair and was not being repositioned by staff. Continue to 9099C During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1's file and interviewed Resident Services Director. LPA was unable to find any completed reassessments and/ or service plans to indicate that R1 required repositioning. According to the Resident Services Director, R1 was able to walk with a walker but at times needed a wheelchair. Based on the physician's report dated 12/28/2023, R1 was listed as ambulatory. According to a staff member interviewed who was employed during the time R1 was at the facility, R1 did not need repositioning as he/she was able to walk with a walker. In addition, it was stated R1 required assistance getting up from bed and getting back down in bed. Based on the interviews conducted and information collected, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reviewed with Resident Services Director, Maryanne Rodriguez and a copy is provided

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Care and supervision as defined by statute and rules

    87464 Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical records reviewed, the resident was found to have a diganosis of dehydration and UTI when admitted to the hospital which resulted in the resident needing multiple doses of IV fluids while at the hospital. This finding poses an immediate health a safety risk to the resident in care.

  • 87506(a)Type A

    Maintain separate complete record for each resident

    87506: Resident Records: (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staffThis regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on R1's file reviewed, there were no completed reappraisals, no service plans, pre-admission appraisal, functional capacilities in the file.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 9, 2025 inspection of MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVING on January 9, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVING on January 9, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87464 Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 8710..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.